165
China blocks use of Intel and AMD chips in government computers (www.ft.com)
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by Alsephina@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
29 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Archive link

Microsoft’s Windows and foreign database programs also sidelined as Beijing favours Chinese hardware and software

Among the 18 approved processors were chips from Huawei and state-backed group Phytium. Both are on Washington’s export blacklist. Chinese processor makers are using a mixture of chip architectures including Intel’s x86, Arm and homegrown ones, while operating systems are derived from open-source Linux software.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] someguy3@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

If I can ask, if we go way back like 40 or 50 years ago, why did cisc get adopted over risc?

[-] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

Cisc was never adopted. It all started out basic, then they gradually added more and more shit until you had a complex CPU.

Without the concept of risc there wouldn’t be a cisc.

[-] 7heo@lemmy.ml 7 points 7 months ago

Additionally to the other answer: the reason CISC came up to be was "less instructions". Memory was a lot more expensive, and developers worked in assembly a lot more. So, less instructions made a lot of sense. Now, memory is cheap, and developers almost never write assembly unassisted.

this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2024
165 points (100.0% liked)

World News

32326 readers
564 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Rumblestiltskin@lemmy.ml
AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
jackmarxist@lemmy.ml
zephyreks@lemmy.ml
OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml