854
submitted 9 months ago by lledrtx@lemmy.world to c/workreform@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Bayz0r@lemmy.world 29 points 9 months ago

I think asking for lowered compensation is definitely shitty and he should be condemned for that.

However, can someone explain to me the vitriolic opposition to downsizing/layoffs whenever this topic comes up?

I don't see how anyone has a right be hired and work at X company. It is, after all, their company and their decision. Surely we can all agree that sometimes companies make strategic mistakes in terms of hiring and need to correct them later on. Also, circumstances could simply change, products be canceled or no longer need as much manpower etc.

What am I missing?

[-] PutangInaMo@lemmy.world 28 points 9 months ago

I'm not against it in it's entirety partly because of the point you made, it is their company after all.

What I am against is the intent behind cutting employees.

First, it's just irresponsible to grow a company outside of what it can sustain. But in the end, the company survives and profits while the employee is now unemployed. The worker suffers because the top fucked up.

Second, corporate greed. It's fucking up people's lives for profit it technically doesn't need to continue to exist and be successful.

It's a human sacrifice to an entity that doesn't even exist.

[-] Illuminostro@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago

His suggestions are to maximize share values, namely his.

load more comments (10 replies)
this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2024
854 points (100.0% liked)

Work Reform

9976 readers
1 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS