1447
same bed length (feddit.de)
submitted 11 months ago by sexy_peach@feddit.de to c/fuck_cars@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] CoffeeJunkie@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Ones readily available include but are not limited to: Ford Maverick (getting great reviews), Toyota Tacoma, Ford Ranger.

Tbh I wouldn't mess with much of anything else because they tend to be of questionable quality and/or look stupid.

[-] Mishmash2000@lemmy.nz 9 points 11 months ago

Yikes?! A Ford RANGER is considered a small truck to you?? They're part of the growing plague of stupidly large trucks in my part of the world!? :-/ I mean I knew the US had big trucks but I never thought the Ranger would be considered the small alternative?! We're so screwed?! :-(

[-] sibannac@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I saw a 90s ranger next to a new one and the new ranger looks like the size of a 90s f150.

[-] Mishmash2000@lemmy.nz 3 points 11 months ago

It's so shocking?! I'm looking at a Ranger out in the car park right now and trying to imagine something bigger parked out there?! It wouldn't fit within the bounds of the parking space?! Already if there were two Rangers parked next to each other there wouldn't be enough room to walk between them, even if you turned side on :-/ Let alone having room to be able to open the door and get in & out?!

In fact I can see that it's had a flow on effect whereby every other parked car has had to park on the extreme edge of their space to allow room to open the door and get out. If there was one more Ranger anywhere along the line someone would be likely blocked from getting in or out of their car!

[-] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 3 points 11 months ago

Yea all thes suggestions are huge compared to an s10 or ranger or other light truck up til the late 2000s. I hate it so much.

[-] dankm@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago

The Ranger in the 80s and 90s was a perfectly reasonable size. The new ones are gigantic next to them, but they're still smaller than almost anything available in the North American market.

[-] CoffeeJunkie@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

As I stated...it's what's available in the US. It's only bigger from there.

[-] EatYouWell@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

The Tacoma is definitely not a smaller truck.

[-] CoffeeJunkie@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

It is one of the smallest available in US. Of course I'm referring to Tacoma with a standard cab, not the People Hauler 5000 it's basically a minivan crew cab configuration.

The Tacoma would actually be my pickup of choice. I hate the modern styling, but the Toyota build is just so solid & Ford as of late has been disappointing. To say the least. The green movement is not only based on size, but how durable a product is & if it can last for many, many years of reliable operation. Unfortunately we do not have Hilux, but Tacoma is America's version of Hilux.

[-] EatYouWell@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Check out the Hyundai Santa Cruz. It's a smaller truck, but it can pull 3500lb.

[-] CoffeeJunkie@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Now this is just personal taste, but I really don't like the looks of that truck. Cosmetically, I put it on the same level as the Chevy Colorado. Generally speaking, Hyundai isn't known for quality builds like Toyota, not even close.

That said: the new Hyundai Elantra makes the short list of vehicles I'd be interested in, buying new. Scotty Kilmer praises its naturally aspirated, non-turbo engine & traditional build components. Thinks it could last a long time. ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿป

this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
1447 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

9784 readers
5 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS