1170
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Encode1307@lemm.ee 112 points 11 months ago

That's what half of Oregon thinks right now

[-] SoftScotch@lemmy.world 36 points 11 months ago

Mind enlightening me... What's going on in Oregon?

[-] mean_bean279@lemmy.world 83 points 11 months ago

They legalized mushrooms and some other drugs and then (if I recall) made it to where possession wasn’t a crime. Half of Oregon (I imagine you can identify it based on population density) now most likely thinks legalizing drugs means allowing the bad behavior that comes from some of its users. Rather than realizing that alcohol is legal and has bad users as well that cause major harm to our communities but we wouldn’t dare take that away again.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I live in Indiana right on the central Illinois border. Weed is legal in Illinois but illegal in Indiana. You would think all those towns by the Indiana border would welcome the tax revenue from having dispensaries in them (Michigan towns do this to attract Indiana buyers). Nope. Those redneck counties decided that crime would run rampant in their little towns and passed resolutions banning dispensaries.

People from around here still go to Illinois to buy weed. They just drive an hour to do it. It's worth it to them, but they would definitely buy more often if it was one county over. And while we're not a huge city, it's a decent enough sized market that they would definitely get a lot of business. Morons.

[-] SoftScotch@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Thank you for explaining!

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago

Nobody has ever gone on a violent rampage on mushrooms.

[-] Dontfearthereaper123@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago

I know someone who has actually. They didn't actually harm anyone but they did wave a knife around and it 100% would've got bad had they not been tackled to the ground. This shouldn't stop u from doing shrooms tho just know your limits.

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago

Yikes! Must have been a very bad trip. That sounds more like defensive behavior though, rather than violent intent.

You really shouldn't tackle people who are holding knives. I was watching Cops once and this lady was waving around an 8" chef's knife. One cop tackled her and the knife ended up embedded to the hilt in her chest. Idk if she died, but she was definitely fucked up.

[-] Encode1307@lemm.ee 26 points 11 months ago

Drugs were decriminalized. Crime and overdose has gone up everywhere but a majority of Oregonians seem to believe that decriminalization is the cause.

[-] MelodiousFunk@kbin.social 20 points 11 months ago

Is it the half that wants to be annexed by Idaho? It is, isn't it?

[-] Encode1307@lemm.ee 12 points 11 months ago

I wish it was just those mouth breathers. It's also people sick of seeing people smoking fentanyl in Portland, but like I said, that's happening in most cities, not just Portland

[-] angrymouse@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago
[-] mean_bean279@lemmy.world 34 points 11 months ago

No, Oregon by comparison to a large swath of states is definitely on the top end of intelligence. But 48% of a state is definitely still not happy about drug legalization and decriminalization. That’s just something we will deal with as political attitudes change.

[-] angrymouse@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Someone can be unhappy with drug legalization, but believing in strawman to support your point is not cool

[-] enki@lemm.ee 15 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Let me introduce you to every Republican ever

[-] mean_bean279@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

You literally responded to someone who said “this is half of Oregon” and then proceeded to strawman your own foolish opinion that the state must be stupid.

Do you understand what being a hypocrite is or do you just actively engage in comments in bad faith?

this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2023
1170 points (100.0% liked)

Murdered by Words

1520 readers
1 users here now

Responses that completely destroy the original argument in a way that leaves little to no room for reply - a targeted, well-placed response to another person, organization, or group of people.

The following things are not grounds for murder:

Rules:

  1. Be civil and remember the human. No name calling or insults. Swearing in general is fine, but not to insult someone else.
  2. Discussion is encouraged but arguments are not. Don’t be aggressive and don’t argue for arguments sake.
  3. No bigotry of any kind.
  4. Censor the person info of anyone not in the public eye.
  5. If you break the rules you’ll get one warning before you’re banned.
  6. Enjoy the community in the light hearted way it’s intended.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS