Johnson’s aide nominated for peerage appears to have exaggerated time spent at Number 10 (www.tortoisemedia.com)

submitted 1 year ago by DreadPilotGagarin@feddit.uk to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk

1 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The woman who is set to become the UK’s youngest ever life peer appears to have exaggerated the amount of time she worked at Downing Street on her public profile. Charlotte Owen is one of seven names approved by King Charles for elevation to the House of Lords as part of Boris Johnson’s controversial resignation honours’ list.

Her LinkedIn profile states that she worked as a special adviser for the former prime minister from February 2021 until October 2022.

However she is not named alongside others in Number 10 in the annual report on special advisers published in June 2021. She is named in the same report from a subsequent year as working half for the prime minister and half for then chief whip Chris Heaton-Harris.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] theinspectorst@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Her peerage is such a damning indictment of our unelected political system.

She's 29, her career trajectory has supposedly gone from new intern to life peer in six years, she has no other career experience to bring to the table, but thanks to the political patronage of a disgraced former politician she will now be a permanent member of our legislature, making laws that apply to all the rest of us, for the next 59 years based on average life expectancy.

this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2023

13 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

3023 readers

218 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

tom@feddit.uk

GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk

flamingos@feddit.uk