637
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] the_q@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Marrying, among other things, children is a large, normalized part of human history, but that doesn't make it right. Eating meat when you can choose not to is morally wrong. Period.

[-] SorryQuick@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 days ago

The vast majority of the animal kingdom kills other animals for food. But somehow at some point we decided it wasn’t cool for humans to do anymore? What about controlled hunting, where animals will die regardless of whether or not you kill them?

Where do you draw the line? Of course oysters and the likes are fine since they’re incapable of suffering, physical or otherwise. But then what if they’re capable of suffering, but incapable of many other thoughts besides instinct? Depending on how you kill them, they might suffer less than a natural death.

Black-and-white statement like yours “it’s wrong, period” are why vegans have bad reputation. Instead, consider focusing on actual issues, such as poor treatment of animals throughout their lives, or the health advantages of not eating meat.

[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 6 days ago

oysters and the likes are fine since they’re incapable of suffering,

this can't be proven

[-] SorryQuick@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 days ago

They… don’t have brains, that’s proven. Sure, they can process information, but so can mushrooms and even some plants, such as trees. Will you stop eating those too?

[-] xep@discuss.online 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

It makes no sense that a living creature would not have a system in place to detect and avoid harm. Whether we see it as suffering from our point of view or not is irrelevant.

Will you stop eating those too?

I can and have. The primary thing that should inform one on what to eat is and should always be nutrition.

[-] SorryQuick@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 days ago

I can and have You… don’t eat plants and mushrooms anymore? What kind of diet is left then?

It’s the same with plants, they too react to stimuli, that’s how they avoid harm. Like how some plants become “soft” in the face of harsh weather to avoid breaking. Or others physically move. If you cut a plant but not fully, you can see the plant try to repair it. How is this any different from a brain-less animal reacting to its stimuli?

[-] xep@discuss.online 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I don't see avoiding suffering as a tenable or even meaningful way of deciding what to eat, and so I choose based on the effects of what I put inside my body. I eat only animal sourced foods.

How is this any different from a brain-less animal reacting to its stimuli?

I don't think it is any different at all. A narrow definition of "suffering" is reductionist and inadequate.

[-] SorryQuick@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 days ago

I mean I agree, I’m all for a plant-based diet for health reasons. But most vegans out there, including the one I was responding to, only use suffering as their argument. Here the part I disagreed with was the “always morally wrong” blanket statement.

[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 days ago

I eat all kinds of animals. I'm just saying you can't prove muscles can't suffer

[-] SorryQuick@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago

I don’t get it. Pain is processed in the brain, and they don’t have one. Are you implying the muscle itself somehow feels pain? But what processes it?

[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 days ago

I'm not saying they can suffer. I'm saying you can't prove they are incapable.

[-] SorryQuick@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 days ago

There are so many things you can’t prove and yet still act upon, this is a stupid conversation. For literally every other animal out there, it’s proven that pain is only felt once it reaches the brain. Why would you somehow assume muscles now have a mini brain to process it locally.

[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 days ago

I haven't assumed any such thing.

[-] SorryQuick@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago

Since a brain is required to process pain, how else do you suppose they would feel it?

[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 days ago

a brain is required to process pain

I don't know how you can begin to try to prove this

[-] SorryQuick@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago

How can you not? It’s the case for every other animal out there (knock them unconscious and they no longer feel pain). How would one even have what it takes to feel anything without a brain? Reacting to a stimuli and understanding it is not the same.

Besides, by this same logic of “this can’t be proven”, it also can’t be proven plants don’t feel pain, since they also have the equivalent of nerves and response to stimuli.

[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 days ago

it seems like you're starting to understand that the negative claim "muscles can't experience suffering" is unprovable

[-] SorryQuick@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago

I’ll stop right there, feels like I’m talking to AI.

[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 days ago

have a nice day

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (42 replies)
this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2025
637 points (100.0% liked)

I Didn’t Have Eggs

773 readers
187 users here now

People making changes to recipes and then complaining it didn’t turn out.

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS