157
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] zipdog@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Can anyone clarify if this strikes down Biden's plan in it's entirety or just the lump s forgiveness? TBH I always considered the rest of the plan that fixes ballooning interest and unaffordable monthly payments the meat of this plan. The 10k is just meh and isn't really fixing anything long term. Would be really unfortunate if the former got screwed by the latter

[-] Raphael@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Another W for capitalism, another L for the worker class.

[-] zombuey@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

most of what's happening in todays world is not a W for capitalism. Modern conservative thoughts on capitalism have long abandoned the necessary regulation of free markets we enforced for 2 centuries. capitalism only works if markets continually divide winners at the top. If you don't bust monopolies then capitalism begins to rapidly break down. We've known that for a long time and only recently stopped. You lose all the benefits of capitalism without that feature. What we have in America isn't capitalism really at all anymore. This whole concept that the government has no role in capitalism and free markets will always correct themselves is a myth and we've known that since before America. John Locke knew that he was a tax collector for the english crown.

[-] GiddyGap@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I always vote for Democrats up and down the ballot. But this just confirms my choice once again. Hopefully the 26 million people the Republicans screwed over will come to the same conclusion.

[-] zombuey@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

they won't they don't care to go anywhere near reality. It would never fit their perception of the world.

[-] ChickenWings@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I disagree. I was raised in a strongly Republican family. Fox News was perpetually on in my house, and Rush Limbaugh was a staple in the car. It took me until my 20s to start thinking for myself politically, and many years later, I now despise the Republican party and have gained the confidence to be outspoken about it. (I'm quite introverted, so that's kind of a big deal for me.)

For example, I grew up praying in Catholic churches for an end to abortion without really understanding its need as a medical procedure. It was only through education that I learned it isn't the horror show I had been told it is.

I'm just one person, but I know there must be more like me. People do change their views, and I hope more formerly brainwashed people like myself can be encouraged to change as well. There's still hope. Encourage people through education, not insults.

[-] wellsley051@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I am like you! My dad_loved_Rush Limbaugh. But I was raised nondenominational. Became a Calvinist for a little while, worked at a Christian summer camp. Then got my first job at a U-Haul where my coworkers mostly POC. I met my future husband there, who helped me see how fucked up my upbringing was. Honestly it's been twelve years and I'm still uncovering shit.

But yeah, change is possible, just difficult. It's difficult to leave your tribe because they're fuckwits.

[-] CeruleanRuin@lemmy.one 0 points 2 years ago
[-] dingus@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

from here on out, should be referred to as SCROTUS

Supreme Court Republicans of the US.

[-] cyd@vlemmy.net 0 points 2 years ago

I know this upsets a lot of people, but the ruling isn't without justification. $450B++ in government spending should not be accomplished through a legal loophole. (Quite aside from the fact that fiscal stimulus is the last thing the economy needs right now.)

[-] KingCyrus20@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It is absolutely without justification. The language of the HEROES Act allows the Secretary of Education to "waive or modify any statutory or regulatory provision applicable to the student financial aid programs under title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965." This is not a loophole, it is the law, passed by Congress. And regardless of any foreseen impact on the economy, SCOTUS should not legislate. Otherwise, they're just an activist court.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2023
157 points (100.0% liked)

World News

37987 readers
378 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS