743
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

He got exactly what he wanted — a fun murder spree killing liberals with no consequences.

He killed two violent assholes who not only thought attacking people on the streets for their opinions is acceptable, but were dumb enough to attack and keep attacking someone with a gun in his hands. I give zero shits about if he wanted to do it.

It was not murder, since murder means killing illegally, which this was not. Not even if he was hoping they would attack him and went there for that purpose.

[-] GNUTup@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago

Violent bloodthirsty evil thug, then. Is that better for you, Herr Pedant?

[-] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Whether someone is supposed to be in prison is not pedantism.

[-] GNUTup@lemm.ee 6 points 2 months ago

Orchestrating a scenario in which the only possible outcome is self-defense by deadly force sounds an awful lot like premeditated murder, to me. I think you should reevaluate what you consider pedantry.

[-] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

So people attacking him for his opinions is the only possible outcome? Has your brain rotted away?

[-] GNUTup@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

People attacked him because he had a big gigantic deadly gun and was goading a literal angry mob with the gun.

It’s now more clear to me than ever that you are intentionally acting in bad faith. What is wrong with you?

[-] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

People are attacking him because he has a big gigantic deadly gun

He has a right to carry a gigantic gun.

goading

Carrying a gun is not considered goading by any sane person.

[-] GNUTup@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It absolutely is considered goading. If lifting your shirt to reveal a gun holstered can be considered a threat (one that police can legally shoot you over) then carrying a rifle at a protest and starting shit with the protestors is also a threat.

He didn’t go there to make his voice heard — he went there to intimidate and kill.

[-] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

then carrying a rifle at a protest and starting shit with the protestors is also a threat.

If a person threatens someone and gets attacked, he cannot claim self-defense. The jury decided he did not threaten them. It would have been murder otherwise and he would be in prison.

[-] GNUTup@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

The jury also decided OJ Simpson was innocent. Get fucked, boot licker

[-] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

So why don't we have you decide instead of juries? You clearly know better than the rest of the population. /s

[-] GNUTup@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

/uj

If every version of you present on a jury could be replaced with someone like me, the justice system would probably function better than it does now.

/rj

Get fucked, bootlicker.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2024
743 points (100.0% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

10530 readers
285 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS