[-] benfell@infosec.exchange 1 points 1 month ago

@bgainor @dethstrobe

The chronology here is a bit backwards. The reason James Kirk marooned Khan is that Khan was plainly too dangerous a psychopath to transport back to a mental health facility.

[-] benfell@infosec.exchange 6 points 2 months ago

@glorkon @USSBurritoTruck

Star Trek also assumes a truly post-scarcity society in which capitalism plays, at most, a small part.

One of the problems we face in assessing human potential is that we pretty much only know of humans since the Neolithic, when authority and wealth became increasingly centralized. In the Star Trek universe, while authority remains hierarchical and highly centralized, economic inequality is somewhat diminished. These are different sets of social premises and the outcomes might vary.

[-] benfell@infosec.exchange 2 points 2 months ago

@data1701d @ValueSubtracted

Yeah, this'll be a hard pass for me too.

[-] benfell@infosec.exchange 5 points 3 months ago

@ValueSubtracted I recall noticing the sexism on Enterprise. I don't recall noticing it on Voyager, which had two strong female characters. But I'm an old man raised in a more chauvinistic era--I might not notice.

[-] benfell@infosec.exchange 9 points 3 months ago

@ValueSubtracted @cybervseas

By such standards, the Original Series (#TOS) seems positively regressive. I don't mean to defend this, but I'm guessing that, at the time, it was perceived that Enterprise needed to fit into that regression.

[-] benfell@infosec.exchange 2 points 3 months ago

@usernamefactory I did manage to watch it all the way through, but I wouldn’t watch it again. Some of it is just too relentlessly horrific and it didn’t actually become interesting until the final few episodes before they cancelled it.

[-] benfell@infosec.exchange 2 points 4 months ago

@jalanhenning pretty normal for the era.

[-] benfell@infosec.exchange 5 points 4 months ago

@dethstrobe this M’Benga fellow seems like the most interesting character of the lot, with a backstory we’ve only seen bits and pieces of. It’s a shame Paramount will probably kill off its Star Trek franchise before we see more of it.

[-] benfell@infosec.exchange 2 points 1 year ago

@StillPaisleyCat @hopesdead Yeah, I’m wondering if there’s a deal in the works that I, at least, hadn’t heard about.

Paramount has been too much in the news for the wrong reasons.

[-] benfell@infosec.exchange 2 points 2 years ago

@DharmaCurious @SkyezOpen

It's an interesting show, but make sure you've got good sound: I found the accents difficult to parse without it. The series was abruptly terminated, so don't expect a neat ending.

[-] benfell@infosec.exchange 5 points 2 years ago

@ValueSubtracted

I liked #DS9. It wasn't just one big happy Starfleet crew. The interplay was infinitely more interesting for it.

By contrast, I hated #Voyager because even though there should have been tension between the combined Starfleet and Maquis crews, they ruthlessly and relentlessly suppressed even the slightest appearance of it. Also, I didn't think much of Kathryn Janeway's philosophy.

But for these very reasons, most fans seemed to love Voyager and hate DS9.

[-] benfell@infosec.exchange 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

@yildo @MamboGator

Not just humor, but a particularly cynical humor. And yes, I think you have a point: To laugh, you need to be able to laugh at hubris and incompetence.

I turn to #StarTrek because I have encountered these attributes all too often in a real life that much more resembles the hell that Guinan described to Jean-Luc Picard when the crew traveled back in time to keep one of his ancestors on track to launch on a space exploration than not. It just isn't funny to me because I have suffered these attributes my entire life and what #LowerDecks captures is but the palest, most faintly visible shadow of it.

I turn to #StarTrek because I'm desperate for something better.

view more: next ›

benfell

joined 2 years ago