Damn, how was this not big headline news?
Good point, and it will have high speed wireless.
There must be a 4g antenna chipset that is Linux native for industrial use.
me at the rave
LLMs and the entire field of reenforcement learning is fundamentally biased towards the production of Influencing Machines. We are training models at the fundamental level to be subtle and devious con artists.
No, but they could be women.
I don't see it in the hardware design, but from a software perspective the groundwork is there for modularity. Offloading the core compute to the PC frees up onboard processing to run peripherals like full color front cameras (onboard are black and white / IR) and more advance proximity detection, hell hook up lidar and go nuts with full body tracking.
That said, all of that would depend on decent I/O. 2x USB4 ports would go a long way.
Makes sense to me. I have always thought that if the goal is to emulate human-level intelligence then developers should consider the human brain, which not only has multiple centers of cognition dedicated to different functional operations, but also is massively parallel with mirroring as a fundamental part of the cognitive process. Essentially LLMs are just like the language centers being forced to do the work of the entire brain.
More functional systems will develop a top level information and query routing system with many specialized sub-models, including ongoing learning and integration functions. The mirroring piece is key there, because it allows the cognitive system to keep a "stable" copy of a sub-model in place while the redundant model is modified and tested by the learning and integration models, then cross checking functions between the new and old version to set which one gains "stable version" status for the next round of integration.
Anyway, thanks for sharing.
I love this idea, but I agree lack of docker auto-installation as a part of your executable is going to make it harder to convince less techy folks to use, and they (we) strongly prefer a one click installation process at the front end.
Overall though, I love this concept and will give it a shot!
OK, you might be on to something there.
Cooper8
joined 3 weeks ago
I'm ok with both, but prefer co-ops because the members get direct voting on large decisions by default, rather than a proxy vote via an appointed government worker who answers to the municipal government.
That said, there is no reason these can't be one and the same, the local government could fund the establishment of a regional co-op and maintain audit and some other limited authority over it.
I also support long-distance fiber infrastructure being built and maintained by worker's co-ops that would then get paid for service by the regional ISPs. Worker members would be highly motivated to maintain good uptime, and hiring/training members who live local to the fiber lines in remote regions would be possible with the incentive of worker ownership. Once built it is a long term maintenance and security business with steady return, perfect for a worker's co-op that could be financed with private capital at decent ROI.