575
submitted 9 months ago by Ranvier@sopuli.xyz to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] drailin@kbin.social 188 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I was a long-hair male teenager in Texas and got to experience this first-hand. Besides the frequent disparraging comments from teachers and staff, I was also kicked off the track/CC team for my hair because I "Didn't match the image the school wanted to present at athletic events." I had a 4.0GPA, was active in school activities, enrolled in all AP/Pre-AP classes, and was, most importantly, good at and enjoyed running. As a freshman I ran a 5:20 mile, 12:10 two mile, and <20min 5K and was up for varsity consideration in my sophomore year. Despite this, the coach told me, point-blank, that I could only stay on the team if I cut my hair above the ear.

My parents, pissed, yelled at every school admin they could get a meeting with to no avail. Ultimately, even the principle was impotent, apologizing for how this must be "upsetting" but saying that she couldn't do anything. Apparently the athletics coordinator who made the rule didn't report to the principle, but to the district athletics office. My parents told me they would be behind me to fight it up the chain, but I decided that the experience had ruined competetive running for me and moved on.

The enforcement of white, christian, heteronormative values to teens' hair is so insideous. It is used for racism against black teens with braids, homophobia/transphobia against queer teens who don't conform with gender stereotypes, and in my case, just to be fascist assholes to a white cis-het teen boy with long hair. Nowadays I am covered in tattoos, oscillate between long/short/natural/neon hair, and have never felt like a better representative of my institution. I am about to get my PhD, was the president of my department's graduate student association, have taught and ran summer and afterschool science programs for under-represented kids, and fought for (and gotten) better compensation for graduate employees at my school.

Fuck every petty school admin who supports this shit, I am proud of my image, I am proud of teenage me for holding onto his individuality, and I hope that any teenagers in a similar situation can feel proud of themselves too, regardless of how they express.

[-] Dragster39@feddit.de 35 points 9 months ago

During an interview for an office job without contact to clients they told me I should do something about my hair because they are a conservative, family owned company and wanted to represent this.

I simply had long, clean hair in a pony tail. I walked out of there, didn't want that job and am proud of that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] uis@lemm.ee 31 points 9 months ago

Didn't match the image the school wanted to present at athletic events."

Why US is so backwards? Why US schools are so focuced on athletic events and image?

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago

Because if they weren't they might realize how shitty everything around them is.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 184 points 9 months ago

The CROWN act explicitly prohibits school districts from restricting the length of male students' natural hair.

[-] Ranvier@sopuli.xyz 124 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I'm just truly baffled by the petty vindictive vile school officials perpetrating this whole thing. But I guess it wouldn't be the first time racist school officials fight all the way to the supreme court to deny eduction to kids.

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 67 points 9 months ago

they are lauded in their communities for this behavior.

the racists band together, pat each other on the back as they shit all over humanity.

[-] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 52 points 9 months ago

If you're baffled by the petty vindictive vile school officials, you clearly don't have kids, especially in Texas.

I raised my daughter here. It was interesting.

She lives far far away in a civilized state now. I told her not to ever move back here. It's not safe being a young woman in Texas.

[-] Know_not_Scotty_does@lemmy.world 32 points 9 months ago

Im a straight white male and I don't particularly feel safe living in Texas. This state has become a shitshow.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] underisk@lemmy.ml 41 points 9 months ago

“The U.S. Supreme Court recently ruled that affirmative action is a violation of the 14th Amendment and we believe the same reasoning will eventually be applied to the CROWN Act,” he [Barbers Hill Independent School District Superintendent] said.

from the article. they'll probably try to take this to the supreme court and get it overturned.

[-] Assman@sh.itjust.works 16 points 9 months ago

Barbers Hill

Now that's just some serendipitous irony

[-] alilbee@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

It's been a while since I saw the original text in a thread on this same topic, but I think the issue might hinge on length specifically not being included in the law's text, but only style and such. It's obviously a malicious reading of the law, but it's also an indication of flawed legislation that should have been done correctly instead of leaving wide loopholes for people to exploit. Like, even beyond being malicious, Republicans are also just inept at the process of lawmaking. The school system and the legislature of Texas are failing this kid, but I'm not sure if the justice system is or isn't, without the text in front of me. I'm trying to track that down right now to verify.

Edit: If I'm looking at the right text, I'm not seeing length mentioned at all. Only "hairstyle" and "texture" are mentioned as descriptors really. Again, this is foolish. Is it really too much to ask for lawmakers to be explicit in the laws they create? This is like, the first thing you consider as coming up if you think about it for a few minutes.

Double edit: Also, good chance to find a more sympathetic ruling on appeal. The right judge could absolutely interpret "hairstyle" to include length. I would.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 22 points 9 months ago
load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 159 points 9 months ago

This exact same school district already lost a pre-CROWN Act federal lawsuit about requiring Black students to cut their hair.

It's the exact same case, except the new kid's hair is less long and since then (literally in response to it) Texas passed the CROWN Act to make it explicit. Nothing changed to make it allowed, they just decided to keep doing it. And I'd say it's pretty safe to call the judge, who ruled against a previous federal ruling and the law explicitly added in response to the previous violation, is just another Republican racist with no concern for the law. Feels like we need a new round of federal supervision for civil rights in South.

Also, all this seems like something a journalist might want to include in a story.

[-] reagansrottencorpse@lemmy.world 31 points 9 months ago

Sherman should have finished the job in the south.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] madcaesar@lemmy.world 129 points 9 months ago

Republicans : We can't tell people what guns they can or can't own! Also, cut your hair and carry that embryo to term!!!

[-] MojoMcJojo@lemmy.world 27 points 9 months ago

Party of limited government my ass. They just don't want rules that prevent them from telling the peasants what to do. Stay in line peasants.

[-] Altofaltception@lemmy.world 126 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

It's a district called Barbers Hill, what did you expect? /S

In all seriousness though, can we have a Sikh organization sue the bejeezus out of them, as long hair is an article of their faith, and the US Constitution has a thing or two to say about freedom of religion.

[-] Brokkr@lemmy.world 83 points 9 months ago

Sikhs aren't Christians so they don't get the same rights as Christians do according to the Supreme Court.

[-] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 23 points 9 months ago

A federal judge ALREADY ruled on this. It's illegal, period.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Zombifrog@lemm.ee 104 points 9 months ago

Ah yes land of the free and us telling you what you can and can’t do

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] masquenox@lemmy.world 62 points 9 months ago

Ooooh... just like they did over here in Apartheid-era South Africa!

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 59 points 9 months ago

Why do black people have to have the same hairstyles as white people?

(You don't need to answer that.)

[-] Liz@midwest.social 32 points 9 months ago

Why does anyone's hairstyle need to be regulated?

[-] ours@lemmy.world 21 points 9 months ago

And people rightfully laughed at North Korea having laws on accepted haircuts. But that's North Korea FFS.

The American right has lost its mind in anti-woke insanity. They are fighting windmills (literally and figuratively).

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 30 points 9 months ago

I don't need to, but I want to answer.

Control, it's all about control.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (31 replies)
[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 59 points 9 months ago

This is what SMALL GOVERNMENT™ looks like, ladies and gentlemen

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 57 points 9 months ago

I hope the kid bakrupts the superintendent with punitive damages when this is all over.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 22 points 9 months ago

That's just not how Texas courts work.

Wish it was, but...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] frustratedphagocytosis@kbin.social 49 points 9 months ago

So why would this dress code not already be unconstitutional based on sex discrimination? Girls can have long hair, why not boys? The hair grows the same fucking way.

[-] fiercekitten@lemm.ee 14 points 9 months ago

It absolutely is sex discrimination and is unconstitutional.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 46 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

the gov gonna pay for the haircuts or is this just another indirect taxation on kids.

load more comments (15 replies)
[-] SayJess 45 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

At a news conference outside the courthouse, Candice Matthews, a spokesperson for the family, said George had tears in his eyes as theyd left the courtroom.

She said the family is disappointed, angered and confused by the ruling.

“Darryl made this statement, and told me this straight up with tears in his eyes, ‘All because of my hair? I can’t get my education because of hair? I cannot be around other peers and enjoy my junior year, because of my hair?’”

Matthews said that George will continue to serve in-school suspension and that his attorneys plan to file for an injunction in an upcoming federal civil rights lawsuit

He has to go to school. But at school he serves in school suspension. How is that helpful? How is this young man supposed to receive a quality education? (I understand that the cruelty is the point.)

Legally I am not allowed to suggest what I think should happen to the racist fascists involved. Suffice to say it’s not pretty. ☺️

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 21 points 9 months ago

(I understand that the cruelty is the point.)

That really is the only possible explanation I can come up with.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago

Oh it's school jail. Because the cruelty is the point. The denial of education is the point. The oppression is the point.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Immersive_Matthew@sh.itjust.works 40 points 9 months ago

Texas is so going backwards.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 40 points 9 months ago

I hope a ton of people just start claiming religious exemptions.

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 23 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Other than voting, that's probably the most effective way for individuals to fight this.

Plenty of biblical figures who famously had long hair.

[-] superduperenigma@lemmy.world 21 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

God gave Samson superpowers for having long hair.

[-] ivanafterall@kbin.social 40 points 9 months ago

I sometimes half-wonder whether some of the judges in Texas might be the tiniest bit racist.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] als 31 points 9 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] raynethackery@lemmy.world 30 points 9 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Diotima@kbin.social 27 points 9 months ago

Name them, shame them. They deserve the notoriety that their racist behavior offers.

[-] Ranvier@sopuli.xyz 33 points 9 months ago

The superintendent's name is Greg Poole

The school district is Barber's Hill Independent School district

The judge is Chap B. Cain III

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one 26 points 9 months ago

This is very clearly outlined in the CROWN Act. Can the student's family appeal this to a higher court?

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] ExpensiveConstant@kbin.social 23 points 9 months ago

In January [Barbers Hill Independent School District Superintendent Greg Poole] placed a full page ad in the Houston Chronicle, arguing that “being an American requires conformity with the positive benefit of unity"

TIL being American is actually about conformity. Thanks Texas

[-] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago

What a crock of shit. The state that threatened to secede no more than a month ago? A state known for its political divisiveness? A state that enacted its own anti-federal abortion stance? A state that has its own energy grid to separate itself from the federal energy grid? Unity my ass.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2024
575 points (100.0% liked)

News

23367 readers
2787 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS