943
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] mojo@lemm.ee 151 points 2 years ago

Woah crazyyyy, free speech absolutist capitalist seems to hate competition. I wonder why!

[-] dub@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago

Something something free market something something capitalism

load more comments (23 replies)
[-] JakenVeina@vlemmy.net 133 points 2 years ago

Over the past year, Meta has hired dozens of Twitter employees

LOL, you mean all those employees you unceremoniously fired?

[-] aeternum@kbin.social 23 points 2 years ago

I'm sure twatter would have a no compete clause if they could. Maybe they can?

[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 46 points 2 years ago

IANAL, but from what I understand, you can put anything you want in a contract, but it doesn't mean it's enforceable.

So the reason why companies put in non-compete clauses is mostly because people believe it, not because it's really enforceable.

Now if former twitter employees were still getting severance from Twitter while working at Meta, that could be an issue. But generally speaking, if you're not getting money (consideration) non-compete clauses don't matter much.

[-] notatoad@lemmy.world 40 points 2 years ago

In most regions, you're right: you can put a noncompete in a contract, but enforcing it is another matter.

But noncompete clauses are explicitly illegal in California, where Twitter is based.

[-] Stan@lemmywinks.com 15 points 2 years ago

Most severance is paid in a lump sum.

And if they laid you off or fired you, there’s no way they can enforce a no compete clause.

[-] shawnj2@startrek.website 23 points 2 years ago

Noncompetes are basically unenforceable in California, you can make people sign them but they’re about as useful as if they were made out of toilet paper

[-] Black616Angel@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 2 years ago

But wouldn't they be more useful, when made out of toilet paper?

[-] Jallrich@lemmy.one 12 points 2 years ago

I think that it is also different if you get fired. Don’t know in detail, but I assume that if they fire you without a valid cause they don’t have any grounds to complain that you did a sensitive and unique work.

[-] skomposzczet@vlemmy.net 68 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Though I don't think this will happen

[-] root_beer@kbin.social 14 points 2 years ago

Elon's mommy is going to put a stop to it again

[-] nueonetwo@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 years ago

The Zucc needs to take her out for a real nice seafood dinner, then never call her again

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] zib@kbin.social 55 points 2 years ago

These two need to just fuck and get it over with already

[-] Confuzzeled@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago

Tshh as if Zuckerbot has a standard plug or socket for human style relations.

[-] VitoCorleone@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

He probably has but Elon only uses the Tesla standard plug.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Nepenthe@kbin.social 43 points 2 years ago

Lmfao. Well, thanks for the free PR, I'm sure, because some poor secretary in his office knows there isn't jack shit they can sue over.

Not that I'm ever going to pretend to like Meta, but having competition is supposed to be the definition of his precious free market. There's even rules and everything about monopolies. Can't take issue with that unless he's ready to declare himself not a capitalist.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Mantis_Toboggan@lemmy.world 43 points 2 years ago

Fuckerberg should just send that Muskrat a poop emoji.

We should just start inciting for them to have a no-holds-bar, hell-in-a-cell, ladder, hardcore cage fight to the death. Then, when its over, we just don't open the cage.

[-] Thetimefarm@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago

It's ok, it'll take Mark a few hours to unhinge his jaw and swallow Elon's corpse whole. Then he's gunna find a nice warm rock to lay on and digest.

[-] stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I think we should start putting our money where our mouths are and start eating these people and their businesses

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ekZepp@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago
[-] MadgePickles@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 2 years ago

I'm confused, I thought Elon was trying to kill Twitter on purpose.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Squiglet@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago

let them eat each other out

[-] hark@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

Thanks for that horrific mental imagery.

[-] fidodo@lemm.ee 21 points 2 years ago

With ai we can make it a real image

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 11 points 2 years ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 27 points 2 years ago

I don't think it's your competitors that are the problem, Twitter.

[-] 0Empty0@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago

Zuckerberg still wants that match. Decided to step into the social media ring

[-] ShlorpianMafia@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago

All this talk of zuck fighting just reminds me of that South Park episode.

You think you can block me?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Yoz@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago

Lol I hope they fight and burn all the cash

[-] cybirdman@lemmy.ca 22 points 2 years ago

Maybe that was their game with the federation stuff. "Hey we didn't start this, we were just following suit on this open source project". Anyway this logic wouldn't fly in any court, they can't have a copyright on text-based social media. They can only own their branding. Musk is just throwing a hissy fit again

[-] R00bot 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I think Elon is trying to say they're stealing IP because lots of the Twitter employees he fired went to work on Threads. This is probably where the fediverse stuff comes in clutch, as they're just implementing ActivityPub, so it's not like it's industry secrets or anything.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ghariksforge@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Where is my cage fight?

[-] Chocrates@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago

Eh anyone can threaten to sue. Let me know if he finds a lawyer to file that thinks they have standing. I wonder if mom competes are valid if you get laid off. They are mostly not valid at all in California already.

[-] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

i know it's (probably) a typo, but the thought of "mom compete" clauses is cracking me up

[-] Chocrates@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Lol, I'm leaving it!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BoastfulDaedra@lemmynsfw.com 15 points 1 year ago

Can't they just fist-fight each other and disappoint all of the viewers already?

[-] oocdc2@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

I demand a match in the Thunderdome.

On the other hand, it would be the most boring match ever...like two wet noodles fighting...

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Tori4626 13 points 1 year ago

Is anyone surprised Musk is throwing another hissy fit?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 13 points 2 years ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] dreadedsemi@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

Sue for what? Such an entitlement. Should ford and GM sue him for competing with their car business?

[-] duckef@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Zucks hair looks like those tiktok vids of guys who's baber fucked their haircut up.

[-] citable6704@midwest.social 12 points 1 year ago

How preposterous, Human Man Zuckerberg has a completely normal and decidedly regular keratin growth styling!

[-] MagnusRobotFighter@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

let them fight

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
943 points (100.0% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

27208 readers
3478 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS