Personally I despised the amount of character artist advertising that goes on on Reddit's DnD community. In absence of any way of filtering such things out of my feed on Lemmy, I'll likely just unsub from any community where that sort of thing becomes the norm.

I think reddit's staunch hatred for artists is pretty gross personally, I'm very much in favor of letting artists advertise in the manners outlined in the op.

Once post tags/flairs are implemented it'll be easy enough for folks who aren't interested in character art filter it out, and people who are, to actively search for it.

Art is, now, a pretty ingrained part of the DnD/TTRPG culture and I think we should celebrate or at the very least, aide in the self-supporting of the people who create it.

I would draw the line at "Does the post provide freely accessable, usable, non spam content?" If it's just a link to to a store, or a unusability tiny sample of content then it's an ad. But someone just posting unobtrusivly watermarked art or homebrew along with a donation link is fine and benefits the community. (This seems to mostly align with that)

Some subreddits had truly ridiculous politicies, like removing even very high effort, high quality content if is so much as mentioned the existence of a donation link. (Like r/Minecraft)

Other subreddits had excessively loose rules and got flooded with the same thumbnail sized artwork asking for commissions or advertising paid versions.

Would things like watermarks be considered as "usable and not excessively downgraded state"? I don't create any OC and am new to the hobby, but that at least seems like a half-decent way for artists to have their stuff available but not in "perfect" condition.

Agreed. Those stipulations are what I was used to on Reddit and seemed to work for those communities there. Every post has something for free but there's a link to more that's paid. It's exactly how I found most of the content I've bought and subscribed to over the years.

RE Battlemaps: strongly opposed to allowing them. Lemmy.world already has a battlemaps community. Ttrpg.network is welcome to make such a community too, I suppose. That content works for many more ttrpgs than dnd, so putting it in its own space makes more sense than allowing it in here.

RE artwork, if someone wants to post a hand-drawn scene of their group's epic win/loss against the bbeg, that's cool. I think we like seeing dnd success stories from folks, and a picture can be worth a thousand words. But, if that person is open for commissions, I would strongly prefer not to know about it.

IMO advertising needs to be segregated to opt-in communities kept exclusively for that purpose, much like LFG posts get their own space to mot pollute the general discussion.

(Similarly, links out to other sites that have comment sections, like youtube, should IMO be required to have actual supporting text content worthy of discussion, as without it they are just more advertising. That's outside the scope of the original discussion tho.)

Edit: RE homebrew--IMO it too should be sequestered, as it represents a divergence from everyone else's frame of reference.

Sorry for jumping into the conversation so late, but what’s the feeling on podcasts? I have a very small one that I’m quite proud of, and I’d love to share it. I don’t think a post for every new episode release should be allowed, but I feel like an occasional post about milestones or information that others could use should be acceptable. In essence, posts intended to engage with everyone instead of just sell to them.

What about artwork with watermarks? Does that constitute an ad?