379
top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] zebidiah@lemmy.ca 11 points 23 hours ago

as a motorcyclist, i give all teslas a wide berth and put as much distance between me and them as possible as quickly as possible

[-] Folstar@lemmus.org 8 points 23 hours ago

That can't be right. Self-driving was, at most, two years away over a decade ago. The world's richest, and therefore smartest since money is a 1:1 proxy for intelligence, could not have been wrong about this. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have to catch the giga-loop to my launch to Mars Base 5 while my digital assistant definitely doesn't delete all my family photos.

[-] bridgeburner@lemmy.world 7 points 23 hours ago

Well maybe they shouldn't cheap out and should start using lidars, and not only cameras.

[-] zebidiah@lemmy.ca 5 points 23 hours ago

i know people who have BRAGGED to me about how it's driven them home, shit faced drunk!

[-] TBi@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago

Problem with these things is they will work 80-90% of the time. Especially in good conditions. But if anything odd happens…

[-] wasabi_noir@lemmy.zip 33 points 2 days ago

At yet as a pedestrian I’m essentially part of teslas beta testing. I didn’t opt in to being smashed by a fugly as fuck tetrahedron.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 6 points 23 hours ago

Yeah, I demand to be smashed by a hot tetrahedron

[-] its_kim_love 2 points 18 hours ago

Would smash

[-] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago

we also did not opt in to being recorded by these companies. It's different, but it has a long term effect.

[-] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 111 points 2 days ago

We noticed when Musk was promising "Full self driving" to "come out by the end of the year" every year for over a decade now.

[-] moxymarauder@thelemmy.club 4 points 1 day ago

I find myself behind self-driving cars nearly 8 hours a day... I'm convinced every company is drastically downplaying how much these cars are remotely operated by humans.

[-] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 46 points 2 days ago

Good thing they told us. Would never have figured it out from all the murder.

[-] perviouslyiner@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

Original Reuters article

Interesting they say that in advance of each public demo, employees "worked long hours mapping routes and training the software on specific hazards to make the company’s self-driving technology appear more capable than it really is*

[-] CarrierLost@infosec.pub 10 points 1 day ago
[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 51 points 2 days ago

Couldn't have happened to a ~~nicer guy~~ bigger fascist asshole.

[-] 4grams@awful.systems 11 points 1 day ago

QUICK! Somebody get this man a trillions dollars!

[-] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I cant wait until Elon and Bezos race to develop corporate nuclear "technology"!

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Just throwing it out there that nothing about Teslas valuation makes sense^1^ without being first to market with self driving, and with a real moat around it.

1: brain got ahead of the fingers and forgot to write the critical modifier.

[-] HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org 7 points 2 days ago

Maybe I could understand what you mean if you make a proper sentence from it.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

Edited for clarity. I mean that nothing about Tesla's valuation makes sense without them being first to market with self driving, and also some time/ runway to have first mover advantage. Its a valuation famously detached from reality.

And they aren't. From what I've heard their self-driving is bogus, which is also the target of the article.

[-] skisnow@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago

I think by now if you're still holding TSLA and aren't an index tracker, you've drunk the kool-aid and very little is going to shake you out of it.

From what I understand Tesla is a car company only on the eye of us, in paper Tesla are spyware in wheel and that’s from where the money comes from

[-] chillpanzee@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 days ago
[-] thecaptaintrout@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago

Not all unfortunately. Brother in law is very much drinking musk's flavoraid.

[-] Bebopalouie@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

No shit Sherlock, maybe read the countless articles about the crashes.

[-] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Elon's busy building a Dyson Sphere to host data centers for the multi-planet species' AI needs, stop pestering him.

[-] sqw 1 points 1 day ago

i saw a cyber cab tooting along today with a brodude behind the wheel. pathetic. they lost the self driving race and utterly failed to catch up, listen to anyone in the company competent to solve the problem, or simply pivot.

[-] blady_blah@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Ok, I fucking hate Elon and I will never buy any products that he makes, however Tesla's full self driving appears to be the best in the market right now by a decent margin.

I like Tesla BTW and I'm squarely in their target demographic, but I hate that nazi more.

Who else has good self driving that is close to what Tesla has right now? (Asking in case there is something good I should be looking at buying)

[-] call_me_xale@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

If this is "the best in the market", then none of these things should be on the market.

Unfinished prototype technology should not be allowed to control multi-ton machines on public roads.

[-] ZDL@lazysoci.al 6 points 1 day ago

It's the best in the US market, maybe, because Tesla and the US government keep out the competition.

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

Are you unaware of the existence of Waymo? You do realize that Tesla robotaxis have a human handler that follows every car because they aren’t actually self driving right?

[-] blady_blah@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Sorry, my statement was in regards to cars i can own myself, not "robo taxies".

[-] Bebopalouie@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

I read that Waymo is no better at best. Weymo thinks it’s cheaper not to park their cars and have them drive and zip around residential areas all hours of the day and night instead. They are also prone to accidents as well.

[-] sqw 1 points 1 day ago

for what its worth, waymos are endemic in my area, and ive certainly seen them misbehave a little and get into janky situations, but i am generally impressed with them overall. i see them doing things good defensive drivers do, for example, slowing down in ambiguous/tricky situations, etc. they seem to be generally working. however i also read somewhere that they have sweatshops full of people tending to them...

this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2026
379 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck AI

7282 readers
1095 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS