I'm not sure about Thailand, but here in the UK if a restaurant tried to force me to pay in a foreign currency they'd be told to fuck off.
How ridiculous
They would not even be allowed to be open in my country.
This is weird. And considering how the PRC exerts influence abroad, slightly suspicious. But the article is based on a TikTok video recorded after the fact. The headline also does not represent the facts exactly:
he had finished a meal and tried to pay, only to be told that the restaurant did not have Thai QR payment facilities or a Thai bank account. The shop allegedly asked whether he had another form of payment, forcing him to use renminbi.
He also claimed the bill increased by 50 baht (S$2), from 325 baht to 375 baht, after he was required to settle the payment in renminbi.
Yeah, so basically he didn't have cash, wanted to pay by ThaiQR, and they said "sorry, we don't take that, we do take WeChat Pay".
Which could just as easily have happened in any 7-11.
The source is sketchy at best but if true the underlying story is about Chinese overtourism in Thailand which has been a problem for a long time.
Thailand was on its knees begging for Chinese tourists to return after Covid. They'd be wise to do something about the goddamned Russians that are ruining the place - or any of the other endless-repeating-visa-run drug and sex offender contingents - before anyone starts worrying about the Chinese.
Isn't it possible that this is a cash-only business and would've accepted baht in cash? What if the owner was on wechat and that was the only other way to accept payment?
It's not very common but I've been to a few businesses in Toronto where the only form of payment accepted was cash.
Yep, something like that. Quoting myself:
the article is based on a TikTok video recorded after the fact. The headline also does not represent the facts exactly:
he had finished a meal and tried to pay, only to be told that the restaurant did not have Thai QR payment facilities or a Thai bank account. The shop allegedly asked whether he had another form of payment, forcing him to use renminbi.
He also claimed the bill increased by 50 baht (S$2), from 325 baht to 375 baht, after he was required to settle the payment in renminbi.
“Wow, that’s crazy…” I say, having no idea what any of that means.
You know, in other countries, they have different kinds of money, not American dollars. Incredible, I know.
This is world news?
Is the USA the only place allowed here?
Just seems non news worthy. The restaurant only accepts Chinese currency. That's barely local news worthy.
Who said anything about the USA?
Did you actually read the article?
All news is world news.
Just because it’s not about America, one of Americas allies, one of Americas enemies, a country that America is bombing it doesn’t mean it’s not of interest to the rest of the world.
One restaurant owner doing something shady is decidedly not newsworthy at the international level. The local police is going to go enforce legal tender laws, and that will be the end of the story. The only context in which this is news is within some kind of "China is encroaching into Thai sovereignty" narrative, but for that you'd need ...more than the sketchiness of one restaurant.
Thailand is still part of the world, for now anyways.
Doesn't make any sense.
If a restaurant wanted to do this, they'd make you pay before you ate, obviously.
Because it's ragebait. The restaurant accepts baht as normal, but the customer didn't have any cash on them. The restaurant agreed to accept payment in renminbi as a workaround.
What they refused is one particular payment method called ThaiQR, which is not accepted everywhere.
It’s a bold strategy, Cotton.
A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/