93
submitted 1 hour ago by qaz@lemmy.world to c/196@lemmy.world
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] wander1236@sh.itjust.works 6 points 28 minutes ago

This needs more layers of screenshot

[-] tuckerm@feddit.online 1 points 12 minutes ago

I propose that we call it a social media turducken when there's three different sites in one screenshot.

[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 4 points 29 minutes ago

I've seen this "78%" figure thrown around but haven't been able to find the actual source for it. Does anyone know? As far as I can tell, it traces back to the Reddit thread, but I also know that consumer reports aren't always or even usually made easily available to the general public.

[-] voidsignal@lemmy.world 2 points 18 minutes ago

Yeah. It's the old that are a problem

[-] LammaLemma@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 hour ago

Can any gen-z chime in and confirm this?

[-] vagrancyand@sh.itjust.works 2 points 15 minutes ago

Gen Y, absolutely able to tell pretty much 100% of the time. It's the lighting, sound, and depth of objects. Maybe current AI is confusing for really old people that just never used a camera or camera app on a phone, but it's super obvious what is actually filmed and what is generated to look like something that was filmed.

[-] Juan_de_Silentio@lemmy.world 7 points 1 hour ago

I can tell 90% of the time as an elder millennial, and the other 10% I post on r/isthisai or run through a detector.

[-] keimevo@lemmy.world 2 points 36 minutes ago

As a younger gen-x I recognize similar numbers. And the 10% I'm not sure about is usually because there's no people clearly visible in the picture. It's like if our brains were trained from birth to detect subtle signals of something being human...

[-] Wirlocke 1 points 22 minutes ago

I'm a 26 year old gen z and feel I get it right most of the time. If I had to describe it, everything ai touches has this corporate clip-art stock photo style over it. Even when it tries to mimic a different art style or real photos, something feels soulless about it.

Something else, I used to believe that if AI images began to look good and it was used for hobbyist purposes that it might be fine. Despite this I've found that the moment I realize an image is AI I drop it in disinterest. It took AI for me to realize just how much the tiny details of art mattered; because if you look closely at an AI image all you'll see is what's statistically likely to be there unrelated to the subject matter.

[-] Zachariah@lemmy.world 3 points 54 minutes ago
[-] LammaLemma@lemmy.ca 2 points 29 minutes ago

Lol… and that is why I avoid posting responses to istjisAI to avoid training the llms

[-] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 4 points 28 minutes ago* (last edited 27 minutes ago)

Gen X here, and I probably can't tell without trying harder than I care to. Why "probably?" Because I've always despised marketing because it's all lies of heavy exaggeration, implication without actually claiming, and completely unrelated crap that somehow entices dumbasses to buy it (e.g. scantily clad models used to sell cars, tech, etc.).

I block every ad I can everywhere I might encounter them - and when I can't? The mute button works wonders. The harder they try to sell me, the more full of shit I know they are. I don't like being tracked, but that's practically an afterthought compared to the absolute disdain I have for marketing & the amount of bullshit I have to filter in order to glean the slightest bit of actually useful and believable info from an ad.

This sorry world seems to be run almost entirely on bullshit, and who can sling it most effectively. I look at the current White House resident as the culmination of all that is wrong in a world built on lies - lies made not only acceptable, but normal and expected all in the name of "marketing."

Fuck capitalism and the manipulative, greedy, power-tripping assholes that use "marketing" to steal money by convincing people their lives will be so much better with widget Y when they told us just last year that widget X would do the same.

No, I probably can't tell real from AI as easily as the younger set, but that's because I don't care to look at either one. It's all just an endless push to separate me from the pittance of funds I have left over after funneling the bulk of the few funds I've managed to acquire from one rich asshole's pocket to another - never staying in my account long enough to even earn a penny of interest.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 1 points 17 minutes ago

I probably can't but skip it anyway. Even if it's real, it's normally some cherry-picked race-bait bullshit.

this post was submitted on 24 May 2026
93 points (100.0% liked)

196

6056 readers
460 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

Also, when sharing art (comics etc.) please credit the creators.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS