802
submitted 4 days ago by Blaze@piefed.zip to c/fedimemes@feddit.uk
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 days ago

Clearly not radicalized enough if he is willing to let the rich live to be taxed

[-] saltnotsugar@lemmy.world 110 points 4 days ago

Pst. Hey kid wanna try some Linux distros!?

[-] aarch0x40@piefed.social 27 points 3 days ago

I’ve got some real nice Gentoo.  You’ll be compiling for days.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago

Jeez, you can't just go straight for the hard stuff like that! You gotta ease into it with some Bazzite or somethin' first.

[-] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 2 days ago

Arch or nothing.

[-] pedz@lemmy.ca 22 points 3 days ago

As someone that won't drive a car and will not encourage big oil or big car, I'm also delightfully surprised by the somewhat strong presence of "fuck cars" communities on the fediverse, and I can only approve.

[-] Damage@slrpnk.net 15 points 2 days ago

the fediverse's stance is "fuck everything about this"

[-] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 days ago

Fuck consumerism.

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 days ago

funny what happens when you have a system without profit motive so people mostly just talk to other people

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

It does probably help that the general spread includes people who like cars but absolutely hate modern cars and the near ubiquity of them. What I wouldn't do to fire but a single Davey Crockett payload directly at GMs HQ.

[-] ekZepp@lemmy.world 77 points 4 days ago
[-] SnoringEarthworm@sh.itjust.works 48 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

"tax the rich" is a scam?

The wealth tax typically proposed by these campaigns (like 2 or 3%) would raise money but it would not stop billionaires from getting richer. (That's why even billionaires advocate for it.)

The finish line should not be "raise money to fund public programs."

The finish line should be "billionaires don't exist."

[-] MummysLittleBloodSlut 23 points 3 days ago

Don't let perfect be the enemy of good, don't let good be the enemy of okay, and don't let okay be the enemy of "not as bad as it could be"

Because it's starting to get as bad as it can be.

[-] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 days ago

Support everything that is an improvement.

[-] SnoringEarthworm@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 days ago

Agreed.

Pass what you can pass.

But don't let that be the finish line.

[-] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

There literally should just be a cap. Make it something ridiculous like "billionaires are not allowed to exist, so everything you earn past $999,999,999.99 is public property" and I don't see any way how someone could disagree with this other than wanting to be a malicious parasite. That is more than enough money to buy a yacht for your yacht and is also an amount of money that cannot be legitimately obtained.

Just reinstate 1950s top marginal rates. Then have a drink after a job well done.

[-] EnsignWashout@startrek.website 7 points 3 days ago

I've always liked the idea of the cap being an immediate loss of any legal property protection.

This would not be through any process, they simply instantly legally cease to have any property rights anytime they cannot prove their net worth is below the limit.

Any member of the public can reclaim any piexe of their ex-property, until the not-quite-billiomaire gets a court ruling confirming their not-a-billionaire status.

Then the not-yet-billionaires can figure out how to constantly stay comfortably below the limit.

Or...they can file an updated wealth disclosure every time they attempt to keep anyone from walking away with any piece of their former property.

If they want to avoid the inconvenience of their yachts, cars, pets, plants, fences, lamps, and television sets being repossessed, they can negotiate with their employees unions for collective ownership in good faith, instead.

It'll be fun to see how many of them are too stupid to take a good deal, and lose their stupid toys.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Roulette@lemmy.today 16 points 3 days ago
[-] Gorilladrums@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago

Half of these don't apply to me. I'm not necessarily anti AI, pro Palestine, or a leftist. While the fediverse is ultimately dominated by specific groups, it's still more diverse than we give it credit for.

[-] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I don't agree with you, but glad your here regardless friend

[-] Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com 4 points 2 days ago

You're not necessarily pro-Palestine? So you're not necessarily anti-Genocide?

[-] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

You can be against what Israel is doing without specifically being in support of Palestine. But it's harder to explain with a short pro/anti type label.

Palestine is a country and its possible to have a very different feeling to a government and the people.

So the ongoing genocide and the 50 year long siege that Palestinians have been subjected to has no effect on their government or their people? I'd love to see what ideals and morals you support when you spend 50 years under siege.

[-] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

You clearly don't care to even try and understand, so I am not going to bother anymore.

No, I don't care to understand genocide bothsiders

[-] Gorilladrums@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

These aren't the same thing...

[-] Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com 1 points 2 days ago

Explain how "I'm not in favour of the people suffering genocide" is not the same as "I'm against genocide".

[-] FridaySteve@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

And the constant politics is exhausting and difficult to squelch.

[-] Nalivai@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

That's just called living in the world

[-] FridaySteve@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

No, it's really not. It's actually inappropriate in polite society to talk about politics outside of certain contexts. Here on lemmy, folks will use every excuse to shoehorn US politics into every thread and every post. It sucks, it's like there's nowhere to go anymore online without politics folks throwing in their two cents. I spend more time doing irl activities just to get away from it which is a shame because I grew up on BBSs and the internet and I really like communicating with people this way. Just not about that.

[-] Nalivai@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

Everything is politics. The decision to not talk about politics is also politics

[-] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 days ago

We aren't all Americans though.

[-] Nalivai@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I didn't say everything is American politics, although a lot is

[-] FridaySteve@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Everything is politics

Blocked.

[-] Nalivai@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

This too is politics

[-] Nangijala@feddit.dk 4 points 2 days ago

Careful now, my friend. These terminally online crazies are so thoroughly in the pit that they no longer realize that there is more in the world than politics. It's like talking to crazy religious people who will argue about how God is everywhere and in everything every chance they get. There's no point bringing normal reasonable perspectives into a discussion like this. XD if you don't have the same opinion as them you are a fascist or some shit xD the diversity of thought on Lemmy is as plentiful and fertile as the surface of the moon.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] crazycraw@crazypeople.online 27 points 3 days ago

is that kid even wearing any beans?

it's like the artist wasn't even trying to capture our essence.

[-] OpenStars@piefed.social 11 points 3 days ago

I also don't see Taylor Swift's jet... wearing jeans.

Oh, nvm.

img

[-] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago
[-] dreary8154@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago

Why did the kid become a liberal commie just by joining the fediverse.

[-] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

It's either that or complain about all the liberal commies here.

[-] Stache_@lemmy.ml 19 points 3 days ago

My cousin smoked a Fedi once and now he’s an addict. One time he even sold his clothes for a hit of beans

[-] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

It's true!! It happened to me and you could be next!!

[-] P00ptart@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

False. The last frame should have said "I have ADHD" cause I feel that shit in my bones.

[-] andyburke@fedia.io 15 points 4 days ago

Pretty much how it works.

[-] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 13 points 4 days ago

"Also, I run Arch now, BTW. But I might try Gentoo."

"...I've lost him."

[-] X@piefed.world 7 points 3 days ago

Way she goes, lady. Way she goes.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2025
802 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse memes

2309 readers
31 users here now

Memes about the Fediverse.

Rules

General
  1. Be respectful
  2. Post on topic
  3. No bigotry or hate speech
  4. Memes should not be personal attacks towards other users
Specific
  1. We are not YPTB. If you have a problem with the way an instance or community is run, then take it up over at !yepowertrippinbastards@lemmy.dbzer0.com.

Elsewhere in the Fediverse

Other relevant communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS