946

As of this week, half of the states in the U.S. are under restrictive age verification laws that require adults to hand over their biometric and personal identification to access legal porn.

Missouri became the 25th state to enact its own age verification law on Sunday. As it’s done in multiple other states, Pornhub and its network of sister sites—some of the largest adult content platforms in the world—pulled service in Missouri, replacing their homepages with a video of performer Cherie DeVille speaking about the privacy risks and chilling effects of age verification.

Archive: http://archive.today/uZB13

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] OldQWERTYbastard@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago

It's only a matter of time before a data leak happens.

That'll be a fun day.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago

Especially when it's those same politicians that like the porn that they rail against (or illegal porn).

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 30 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Hear me out!

What if parents did their fucking job as they should instead of demanding the state to do it for them, only for it to get hijacked by both

  • christofascists wanting to make it illegal to not live a "christian life",
  • and corporations wanting to ensure competition will need to pay a shitton of money on age verification AI?
[-] expr@programming.dev 17 points 2 days ago

Parents aren't doing this. It's purely a move by the elite to tighten the grip of the surveillance state, using the guise of "protecting the children" to absolve themselves of any scrutiny.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 26 points 3 days ago

This is going to expand. The next wave is going to be keeping kids off of social media. That means they will have to be age-verified, which they can't do, because they're kids, and don't have ID. Instead, everyone else will have to be age-verified in order to use the Internet.

Here in Florida, I've already heard one state lawmaker scoffing at any objections, saying it's the same way we keep kids from buying alcohol - by checking EVERYONE'S ID. Now they're going to do it for the Internet. Every movement and post you make on the Internet will be directly tied to your verified identity. That should be perfectly fine, as long as you aren't doing or saying anything wrong, right?

[-] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 6 points 2 days ago

it’s the same way we keep kids from buying alcohol - by checking EVERYONE’S ID

Tell him there's a big different between checking an ID and making copies of one

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 11 points 2 days ago

It's probably the FREE STATES OF FREEDOM STATES!

[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 62 points 3 days ago

I'm just over here in "hellscape" California enjoying the freedom to not have to do this, and I can walk down the street to the weed shop, and my girlfriend still has basic human rights over her own body.

Do any other states, like Texas, need some of our freedom? We've got some to spare.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 3 days ago

About eight years ago, I moved out of the US to a Third World country but each day it feels less and less like a Third World country.

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 12 points 3 days ago

USA is a third world country with a gucci belt. its also the most right wing of western countries. thats why you see the far right from other western country flock to the USA.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] pleaseletmein@lemmy.zip 56 points 3 days ago

The most important issue facing the world: Someone might be jerking off in the privacy of their own home.

[-] treesquid@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago

Porn is just the foot in the door to force ID for connecting to the Internet. This is techno-fascist dystopian police-state shit, and the "don't tread on me" crowd is just bending over and saying "Please, sir, may I have another? No lube this time!"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] bbwolf1111@lemmy.zip 18 points 3 days ago

It's not just for porn anymore though. My new phone required it to use certain applications. Facebook requires it to sell on marketplace. As for conversations about it, all of this went to supreme court at least 6 months ago, spoilers, they lost in terms of protecting our privacy. There are days THEY win inside my head & I assume they're recording & adverty within my dreams. you don't even need to be a tin-hat wear crazy to believe things like that anymore.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 23 points 3 days ago

This may be the real reason r's are losing all of the elections, lol. They are entirely red states.

https://www.axios.com/2025/01/16/adult-website-age-verification-states

[-] ekZepp@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

MMMERICAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!! 🎉 🎉 🎉 🎉 🎉 🎉 🎉

[-] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 410 points 4 days ago

Everyone who ever submits for age verification will have their information stolen. It is a matter of when, not if.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 127 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I mean, a VPN is way cheaper than whatever hoops Idaho wants you to jump through to watch some 10/10 goth hottie get their ass eaten.

[-] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 87 points 4 days ago

Yea, but soon we’ll have no states to vpn to, and we will have to start using the Quebec servers, then all the websites will be in French and I’ll have to learn a new language.

load more comments (23 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[-] HalfSalesman@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

That's because more than half of the country is some combination of evil and/or retarded.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 127 points 4 days ago

The end game here is to require ID for social media in order to suppress dissent. This is an easy first step due to the longstanding controversy surrounding pornography.

It's all about control.

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] wuffah@lemmy.world 78 points 3 days ago

I would like to dispute the primary supposition here that pornography is harmful. The use of pornography is nearly universal, and most of the harms that it supposedly causes are symptoms of other issues, or are invented to impose control of sexuality. The ability to reach out with the power of the law to impose religious edicts or project sexual hangups is one of the most esoteric, yet effective, forms of political control available other than violence. If you can control the way that people express their sexuality, you can probably also control their views through the monetization and restriction of sex.

Sexuality and privacy are human rights, and the creation of and access to pornography is protected by the first and fourth amendments under which so-called “age verification” is an unnecessary and excessive burden. If the idea is to prevent access to children, ask yourself why now all adults must now have their access prevented or interrupted.

Furthermore, it is not the state’s role to control childhood sexual development, and the idea that porn is harmful to minors is debatable at best and dubious at worst. Access to objectionable material is solely at the discretion of parents. The fact that they cannot effectively manage this is a symptom of another problem.

When Meta shows teenage girls makeup ads after they delete their selfies, or streaming apps are flooded with violent movies that are easily accessible to minors, this is acceptable. But when I want to watch porn it’s now my job to “protect minors” by compromising my privacy and security?

The real “danger” here is the availability of ideas that do not align with state power.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] sturmblast@lemmy.world 61 points 3 days ago

Yeah, I will never show my ID to a fucking porn site, get real

[-] rarbg@lemmy.zip 26 points 3 days ago

fucking porn site

No need to be redundant

[-] Sunflier@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago

Then you can't offend god by watching it and masturbating, like we intended!

-The Puritans pushing this legislation.

[-] BanaramaClamcrotch@lemmy.zip 28 points 3 days ago

So much for small government…

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] pachrist@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Pornhub

sister sites

Guys, I've cracked it.

[-] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

What are you doing step-bro site?

[-] Saapas@piefed.zip 53 points 3 days ago

I'm not against proper age verifications as such, it would be like carding people in a store or a bar. But I just haven't seen an implementation of it that isn't prone to being a privacy nightmare and surveillance state shit.

I know there's some systems that generate a token that verify that you are 18 and you give that to the site, so neither side directly meet so to say. The site knows only that you have a valid token for being 18 and the app or service you use to generate the token knows just that you wanted to token for something. I think Spain was figuring out a system like that.

load more comments (25 replies)
[-] entwine@programming.dev 21 points 3 days ago

I just remembered that I'm the guy everyone in my family goes to when they need someone to scan their ID or passport for whatever stupid bullshit.

Guess it's time to sign all my conservative family members up to gay porn websites!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rockettaco37@feddit.nu 20 points 3 days ago

Land of the free, eh guys?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] peaceful_world_view@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago

But gun control is too hard. smh

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] chunes@lemmy.world 66 points 4 days ago

Never thought I would live to see this day. Utterly pathetic. I remember even 20 years ago online censorship was extremely taboo.

Making it easy for normies to get online was a massive blunder.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] notreallyhere@lemmy.world 31 points 3 days ago

half of states does not equal half of americans

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Mediocre_Bard@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I'm prepared for my downvotes.

I have often joked that in the not-too-distant-future people will look back upon the early days of the internet like we look upon the 1950s view of smoking.

What do you mean kids shouldn't do it? It's fine. You know how it is, watch a kids cartoon, look at some memes, two girls 1 cup, email the fam, those two Mexican dudes who had their heads cut off with a chainsaw, research Ghana for a school project, sneak in some porn after the parents go to bed, and cap it off with some chat room conversations about Picard's superiority to Kirk while some kid across the country goes on about shooting his brains out because mom and dad either don't love him enough or love him too much. Maybe download some credit card spoofers and Diablo hacks for online play if you aren't quite ready for bed.

The early internet, and even the internet now, is a fucking wild concept. Take everything that people think, not just what we know, but what we fucking think about while we are taking a shit, and make it available for anyone look at without guidance or context. We can even watch police shootings in real time and pretend to be detectives during terrorist events, consequences to real people be damned.

Should parents know better? Sure. Is the internet an effective babysitter while they grind out a living? You bet.

If we restrict this dumpster fire behind age-verification and eliminate anonymity through tagged identification, the effect on privacy and anonymous online activism will be severe. However, CinnamonRingCumGlaze86 will be significantly less able to use their 6th grade reading level to convince people that modern medicine is bad because Pre-Historical Witches didn't have AIDS bro. #flatearth #zoroastrianismwasasteptoofar #onceagaintherealproblemiscapitalismandwearelookingatthewrongthingbecauseofmanufactured-outrageandobfuscationcreatedbytheoligarchy #worldofwarcraftclassic

[-] fishy@lemmy.today 7 points 2 days ago

As the parent of a 4.5 year old I gotta say, what a stupid fucking take.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] TriangleSpecialist@lemmy.world 136 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

That will protect the children, for sure.

If I lived in the US, I'd be far more concerned about sending my kids to school but whatever.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] l_isqof@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago

Lo and behold, ladies and gents, the land of the free, where even jerking off is chargeable...

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 56 points 4 days ago

The death of freedoms by the day.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] unphazed@lemmy.world 54 points 4 days ago

Watch them retreat once Grindr states that due to increasing safeguards and transparency, all of their files will be released to the public.

[-] IndridCold@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 days ago

Sorry, MAGA. If you want to stroke it to trans porn, you need to show ID.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2025
946 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

77361 readers
2169 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS