308
submitted 1 day ago by fne8w2ah@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] cley_faye@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

Is it that uncommon to have a passport in the US? That's basically part of the common ID paper you'd have here.

[-] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

Yes. We can travel over 3000 miles and still be in the same country with about every climate. Meanwhile for a family of 4 it would cost almost $700 to get passports and involve waiting weeks. Then flying say Seattle to Paris for instance would cost about $3000 before actually doing anything there. This is in addition to the $300-$400 spent every 5-7 years on normal identity documents that you need for other purposes. This cost varies substantially state to state.

Meanwhile families here are facing drastically escalating costs especially housing and medical.

Compare that to a European who could travel 100 km on the train and be in another country.

Americans have both increased dis-incentives and less incentives to travel internationally compared to Europeans.

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 15 points 5 hours ago

Basically extortion to continue the absurd, ineffective security theater.

[-] Cattail@lemmy.world 20 points 15 hours ago

So is this just legal way to bribe the TSA

[-] khepri@lemmy.world 40 points 21 hours ago

A passport is a really good thing to have, and lasts much longer than a Real ID state license. It ends up costing like $13/yr and it opens up the whole world to you. It blows my mind that on;y 50% of US citizens ever bother getting one.

[-] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

It costs 165 bucks per person or almost $700 for a family of 4. Then they need $3000-$5000 to travel round trip once to a destination in Europe.

[-] DempstersBox@lemmy.world 1 points 3 minutes ago

Why is europe the only place you're considering travel to? It's a big world out there

[-] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 2 points 3 hours ago

It costs thousands of dollars to travel to another country from the US.

[-] DempstersBox@lemmy.world 1 points 3 minutes ago

There are other methods than direct flights

[-] khepri@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

For some people in some cases, sure. Myself, I traveled in South America for 3 months last year and overall I saved money vs. expenses in the US, even with airfare included. Also, there's probably 100 million Americans that live within a single tank of gas of getting to Mexico or Canada. There are plenty of lower-income Americans, Brits, Aussies, and Germans (to name the big groups) who manage to travel extensively for long periods at very low expense. I've met many of them, and they could make "thousands of dollars" (let's say you're talking about $3,000) last a good three months in many parts of the world. Look for deals, be willing to not get exactly what you want, and be patient, and travel can be (and had been for me) cheaper overall than paying US prices for housing food etc.

[-] KelvarCherry 2 points 3 hours ago

As a passport holder myself, that was my plan. This article has me wondering if we'd still be charged the fee. TSA is notoriously stupidly incompetent, and I wouldn't put it past this system to be giving kickbacks to agents.

[-] khepri@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

idk, not by the letter of the law, no. But they are they are pretty awful sometimes. I personally always used my passport for all flights even before REAL ID existed, it's just easier for them than offering a license from a rural state like I live in that they may see once or twice a day.

[-] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 7 points 5 hours ago

Man, some of us are annoyed every time we have to drive into town to shop for groceries or go to work. I'm surrounded by nature at home. I don't want to travel. You'd have to B. A. Baracas me to get me on an airplane or boat. I neither need nor want a passport.

[-] khepri@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

hahaha now there's something I haven't thought about in a minute. I honestly hate airports, airplanes, the TSA, and flying myself. But I do love seeing places and people and experiencing things that I never would have otherwise, whether that's in my home town, across the state, or across the world, count me in :)

[-] jaxxed@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

Upvoted purely for a-teaming

[-] pixeltree 2 points 4 hours ago

OMG I forgot about that thank you

[-] OldQWERTYbastard@lemmy.world 20 points 12 hours ago

Well over half of us live paycheck to paycheck and traveling is exorbitantly expensive. Especially international travel.

It sucks being broke.

[-] DempstersBox@lemmy.world 1 points 1 minute ago

Travel can be done cheap. Don't go to the exorbitantly expensive shitty fake ass resort where you get food poisoning.

Go be real, in the real world.

[-] innermachine@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

Ding ding ding- the commenter your replying to must not be poor to think buying something you cannot use is a good idea 😂😭

[-] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 35 points 20 hours ago

Many citizens don't leave their state. Plenty of them are hand to mouth and can't afford groceries. Even local travel is a luxury to some, so I can understand why they might not have the desire to go through the process and pay for the passport, not to mention that many people don't know their SSN or have their birth certificates.

[-] ghostlychonk@lemmy.world 22 points 20 hours ago

Don't forget that transgender Americans can't get passports with the correct gender, either.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 175 points 1 day ago

Showing this was not about security at all.

[-] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 18 points 22 hours ago

Well, it's never been about security, it's about surveillance. But it is reasonable to assume that REAL ID is their most efficient way to track travelers, and if you make them use their less efficient methods of tracking, they'll offset the difference by charging you directly.

It never was

[-] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago

One could argue surveillance and tracking is about security. They'd be wrong. But they could argue that.

[-] meco03211@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

That's absolutely about security. Just not yours. There's a lot of people whose financial security is at risk if they can't sell that data.

[-] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 7 points 16 hours ago

I mean, at this point we’ve known it was coming for like 20 years now - really no excuse to not have one.

[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 14 points 15 hours ago

My excuse was I didn't want a federal ID card. Not under a democrat and especially not under Trump.

[-] Homesnatch@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

Real ID is still a state issued ID. It just now complies with a federal standard.

Passport is a Federal ID.

[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

So it's a state id card the federal government will have an easy time accessing rather then a federal id card the federal government will have a easy time accessing?

[-] Homesnatch@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

The real ID requirements on state-issued cards don't change or improve the ability for the federal government to access.. They already have all the access they need into state IDs and all your info plenty of other ways.

All state IDs, real ID or not, are shared with the NLETS Federal registry.

[-] bluegreenpurplepink@lemmy.world 104 points 1 day ago

Title leaves out "or passport."

In a push to get you to think you must have a Real ID, I've noticed the media constantly leaves out or minimizes the fact that a passport is sufficient to get you through an airport or any other place a Real ID is required.

So no extra fee of you have a passport.

[-] SomeSphinx@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

Okay good, I used my passport last time I had flown so I was worried I'd have to cough up an extra fee the next time.

[-] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 9 points 13 hours ago

I've always just considered a passport to be a Real ID™.

From the U.S. Department of State website: https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/News/passports/passports-realid.html

The U.S. passport book and passport card are both REAL ID compliant.

[-] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 3 points 15 hours ago

Both Real IDs and passports are the premium options, you pay extra to have them.

[-] WaistGunnerPug@lemmy.world 22 points 23 hours ago

You know some dumb shit TSA is gonna not understand that part.

[-] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 12 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

I never got one because my license expired during covid and i didn't have a recent bill/bank statement (and I had no intention of walking into a DMV at that time) fortunately i do have a passport that i plan to renew as soon as it expires, but my passport is supposed to be for international travel, not domestic.

it wasn't that long ago that you only needed a birth certificate to travel to the caribbean or a border country. this is getting out of hand.

[-] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 3 points 13 hours ago

but my passport is supposed to be for international travel, not domestic.

You can get a passport card so that you don't need to carry around the book

[-] BigDiction@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

Do you have a recent W2 or tax return with your current address on it? That + valid passport is good in my state.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 67 points 1 day ago

We still need to go through the process to make sure that we verify who you are

As long as I don't have any weapons it shouldn't matter.

[-] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 43 points 1 day ago

but how else will we track where everyone is all the time

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] MyMindIsLikeAnOcean@piefed.world 47 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

It would only make sense if it was a one time fee, and you got your ID as a result.

We also know it’s not about security, or you couldn’t fly without one.

We know it’s a cash grab because they’re counting on a “built-in” amount of flyers who won’t have or will refuse to get ID with privacy issues. If, by some anomaly, more or all flyers acquire the ID, then we’d see maintenance fees added and the fee itself increased to maintain revenue certainty - but who are we kidding, those things will eventually happen anyways.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 14 points 22 hours ago

I paid for a real id license when they were first available in my state, and I’ve paid for a renewal. I disagree with the surveillance society they enable but I’m also a realist who wants to travel conveniently.

But I’ve still never gotten one. When it comes down to it, actually getting a real id license requires taking a day off work and waiting in line at the Registry …… whereas I can renew a standard license online and have a few years left on my passport

One of the many ways RealID has been a fiasco is RMV/DMV’s not staffing up to support it

[-] BanMe@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago

I'm in a backass hillbilly state but I just made an appointment at the DMV and then had to wait all of 5 minutes when I got there. But, then they tried to argue every single piece of paper I brought which involved calls to supervisors so it wound up being a 40 minute ordeal. I swear they don't want you to actually get it.

[-] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 14 points 23 hours ago

While this is ridiculous. The original requirement date for a real id was 2008. It has been 20 years since real id was passed. You have had 20 years to get one.

[-] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 27 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Dude it was hard enough for my wife to get a new ID (not REAL) when we moved from RI to MA.

I do all the bills and handle all the finances. My credit was better (now we are about equal) and so all the utilities and most the credit cards are in my name. Not to mention most of them are paperless.

At the time, I think she was also still on a cell phone plan with her siblings.

So, like, absolutely no official-enough mail coming to our house to her name. And they need 2.

What, exactly, is the purpose of an ID, and why does it need my SSN and two pieces of mail? How does that identify me, as a person, any more than a supporting document like an existing US Passport? If I qualified for a US Passport, why the hell do I need so much more on top of that for just a state issued ID.

The whole thing is a scam to bully minorities and put an additional burden on traveling for low-income families. I wonder how many people are missing flights to some important and unexpected event (i.e. a funeral) because they never fly and never had a reason to get a REAL ID.

For that matter, I'd really like to know what TSA gets out of a REAL ID that they don't get out of a regular license, for domestic travel? They don't care about my proof of residence, they only care that the name matches the boarding pass and the face, and isn't Islamic or otherwise off-white.

[-] Jumbie@lemmy.zip 6 points 19 hours ago

How long until they require it to vote so it shuts out a majority of the voters from participating in elections?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2025
308 points (100.0% liked)

News

33340 readers
3072 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS