I never understood government regulation being portrayed as bad by the proponents (not profiteers, as in their case there is a much more obvious incentive) of capitalism. As a business owner you are "not allowed" to break the laws of physics. You can't build a factory that makes your product out of air (unless you sell liquid nitrogen I guess). No one makes an argument against physics. If the government decides you also can't build a factory that dumps all it's waste into the residential watersupply that's just the rules of the game now. It's not like your rivals are going to be any more allowed to that, so why be bitch about it? As long as everyone plays by the same rules - be they hard truths or laws that ensure the welfare of the people - there really is no argument to be made against tweaking them. If your business model doesn't leave space for safe waste disposal, should we go with that example, then your business model is just as ridiculous as trying to for example make cars out of thin air.
These people are the kind to talk about how smart and great they are and that’s why they deserve hundreds of millions of dollars but also when all the studies show that four-day work-week would lead to increase productivity and a high quality of work they kick and scream like little babies.
They don’t know what they’re doing so they complain about the rules that make things hard. Why get good when you can just throw a temper-tantrum and then brag about how you finished Dark Souls without telling anyone that you played it on god-mode?
It's because regulations cut into their profits. The line must always go up.
I totally get that just not from the people who don't actually profit. If you think capitalism is good but don't actually get a slice of the cake you really shouldn't oppose regulation.
If capitalists could alter the laws of physics to increase profits, they absolutely would.
If social policies put you out of business, you don’t run a business, you run a racket.
This tshirt I would buy. Or hooded sweatshirt
Tell that to the military.
Military should not be a business.
They need that memo too.
I mean.... I would
2025 update:
'can't pay artists to train our ai models, it'd put us out of business!'
I wish they would. AI VA could be so great if people were just paid properly.
Imagine- You have the English Voice track for Arnie in Terminator- but you need a Chinese version.
Old worlds- You either have a bad local VA that sucks but is at least 'acting' OR you have people reading the script over the English version, you get the inflections from English, but the verbiage from local... script readers.
Imagine if instead of using AI to cheap out, you got those local VA's to do a version of the voices (and paid them!) then ran it through an NN so that the input was the local VA and the output is a combination of that and Arnold's voice (and all parties are paid appropriately, this isn't suppose to be a cheap out process) such that you could hear 'arnie' in all langauges - That would be great.
But instead we just get cheating artists out of pay for a worse quality product.
You’ve already shown a flaw, which is that English inflections do not match other languages. “I will go” in English is not “Je irai” in French but rather some more like “moi, j’irai.” The sound of the voice also wouldn’t make any sense because different dubs will change to fit local stereotypes. In the states they will have someone sound like a redneck but in Germany they might lean into a Bavarian accent for the same effect.
With the low level of understanding demonstrated in your comment, plus the high level of confidence in your solution, you’re showing exactly why it’s a bad idea. Just pay voice actors and pay them enough that they will actually be of a certain quality instead of bitching that the dime-store VA people aren’t giving you top-tier performances.
Take the AI and throw it straight in the garbage. We don’t need it and we don’t fucking want it. All it does is cost more money to produce a product that only an ignorant, over-confident corpo thinks is any good.
They can't even make money stealing other people's work. Actually paying for it is out of the question. Right now they're still living in the free money portion of a bubble. The crash is going to hurt a lot.
Can't stop exploiting animals, it'd be bad for the economy
I'm a little more upset that we can't stop exploiting people.
To be fair, unless you've got a fair system to begin with, raising the minimum wage won't increase purchasing power anyway. Prices just scale up.
The people against it keep making that argument, and it keeps not being true.
I'm barely holding on wtf are you on about?
You might be well off enough that it isn't true for you.
That's why you go one step further and tie minimum wage to inflation/GDP/cost of living. Hardly done anywhere, but I'd wish that happens.
Which study says that?
There's no need for an additional study when we already see it in existing countries.
That's funny, because prices in states with a higher minimum wage than federal aren't proportionally higher than states with a lower minimum wage.
It's almost like payroll isn't the only expense the company has.
Got an example? How do you see a whole country without a study?
They don't have an example because it isn't true. But I know you know that.
Microblog Memes
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
Rules:
- Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
- Be nice.
- No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
- Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.
Related communities: