160
submitted 1 week ago by nulluser@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Just last year, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott joined a bipartisan chorus of governors in denouncing a Biden administration plan they said would strip states of powers guaranteed to them under federal law.

The plan would have transferred Air National Guard units from six states to the U.S. Space Force, the newly created military branch, stoking concerns about federal overreach and the erosion of governors’ control over their own guard forces. Texas wasn’t among the affected states, but Abbott made his opposition unmistakable in an open letter to the president.

He called the plan an “intolerable threat that would set a “dangerous precedent.”

“I strongly oppose any attempt to sideline governors when it comes to their respective National Guards,” he wrote.

A year later, Abbott helped Donald Trump do just that. He said that he “fully authorized” the president’s plan to send Texas National Guard members to Illinois and Oregon to protect federal law enforcement personnel who are executing immigration laws. Those states’ governors vigorously objected, saying such action was an unnecessary escalation that interfered with state sovereignty.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago

Greg Abbott has never been about state rights. He's a contrarian for the sake of being "different". Broken dip shit has no idea how to be a decent person anymore.

[-] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Yeah, there is a common misconception that conservatism is about "small government" and "States rights."

In reality, these reactionaries will use any kind of bad-faith argument, distraction, distortion, or outright lie to consolidate power for their white-supremacist christofascist project.

Their only true principle is that they can tell other people what to do and how to live. The purpose of every single policy and process that they push is to defend and entrench the hierarchy from which they benefit.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Yep. It's always been about their perverted notion of "liberty", meaning, the Southern kind.

[-] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 week ago

They never care about "states rights" they value it when its useful to enforce their agenda and don't care for it when it interferes just like the southern states hated states not cooperating with "slave catchers".

[-] DougHolland@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

"States' rights" is a bullshit argument and always has been a bullshit argument

[-] Corvidae@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Wouldn't it be nice if we only owed taxes when the party in power is the same as ours? We could call it "partisan taxpaying".

Abbott’s arguments then and actions now are an example of what Jessica Bulman-Pozen, a constitutional law professor at Columbia University, calls partisan federalism, a term describing how state leaders’ fervor for defending their sovereignty increasingly depends on whether their party is in power in Washington. She said Abbott’s support of the guard deployments is particularly alarming because it diminishes the traditional power of governors to manage law enforcement in their states.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

The conservatives and the Republicans have always been full of shit in every key talking point they ever used. They only care about "states rights" when it comes to stripping away human rights.

They don't give a shit about liberty or the Constitution, either.

[-] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

While Trump is blowing bubba…Abbott is blowing Trump.

[-] DarkAri 2 points 1 week ago
this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2025
160 points (100.0% liked)

News

33420 readers
1792 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS