277
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

Paris's Louvre museum said on Thursday, November 27, it would raise ticket prices for most non-EU visitors, meaning US, British and Chinese tourists among others will have to pay $37 to get in.

The museum told Agence France-Presse (AFP) the 45% price hike aims to boost annual revenues by up to $23 million to fund structural improvements at the world's most-visited art museum, which is reeling from the daylight theft of priceless treasures last month.

From 2026, visitors from outside the European Union, Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway will have to pay €32 – an extra €10 – from January 14, the museum and staff unions said after the measure was approved at a museum board meeting.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Feyr@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

32 whole euros a 45% increase?!. OMG!

In seattle it's 25usd to enter a third class shitty aquarium, and it doesn't even have historical artifacts, and barely any fish

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 47 points 2 days ago

But I can still get in that back window for free, right?

[-] Rcklsabndn@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

BYOCS (bring your own circular saw).

Edit: fixed cheeky abbreviation.

[-] titanicx@lemmy.zip 94 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I heard German ladder trucks are good for bypassing this fee increase.

You can even take your favorite pieces home for continuous access.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 52 points 3 days ago

Someone has to pay for security they finally figured out is needed

[-] thericofactor@sh.itjust.works 37 points 3 days ago

I've been to Russia (st. Petersburg) where entering a church would cost $10, but for Russians a couple of rubles.

It makes sense from the perspective that locals should be able to afford seeing their own art and architecture. If foreigners can afford it and are willing to pay the asked amount, I sort of understand.

[-] TronBronson@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

That’s generally how you want to set up your tourist attractions. They provide entertainment and draw for residents and you pass upkeep costs onto the visitors.

[-] itsprobablyfine@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 days ago

I usually agree with this point but it does create an awkward spot for museums with a lot of international exhibits. Like, you did a colonialism, stole my peoples stuff, brought it back here, and are now charging me extra to see it? Idk how you get around that, except maybe returning the stuff I guess.

[-] TronBronson@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Yea returning the stuff and allowing the origin countries profit off it would be nice. We lose a lot of history to war torn countries tho. Preservation has a cost and its own logistics. If you knew the item would be pawned off or destroyed; morally I’d like the history with someone who has the resources to preserve it and share it with as many as possible. International travelers can probably afford the hit. Presuming the effected people you describe can afford to travel.

[-] ieGod@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago

If you knew the item would be pawned off or destroyed; morally I’d like the history with someone who has the resources to preserve it and share it with as many as possible.

I recall this being discussed a while back after yet another overzealous regime destroyed some of their culture and heritage; preserving this history under capable custody would have been beneficial for everyone. I get it's complicated but for the most part these well run long lived museums in stable countries provide a great service to humanity.

[-] TronBronson@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Yea, it would be interesting to have a global body like the UN working on this with public opinion. We can always be seeking a more moral and just world.

I’m in the USA: proof that a rich country will destroy their own history without much thought so ya it’s become increasingly nuanced as time progresses

[-] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Given the stolen artifacts if anything non-eu should pay much less.

[-] skisnow@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 days ago

People give the British Museum a lot of shit, but it's free all year round for everyone.

[-] Laser@feddit.org 4 points 2 days ago

Well I mean they didn't pay for most of the stuff in there in the first place

[-] skisnow@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

They spend over £50,000,000/year on care, research, and conservation.

A significant portion of what we know about the ancient world is a direct result of their research sharing and activities; for example when the Rosetta Stone was in French hands they kept it to themselves, when it was in Egypt they did nothing with it, but when it came to Britain it was shared with research departments across Europe as well as in Britain, resulting in our ability today to read hieroglyphics and demotic script.

Think about that for a second: if the Rosetta Stone had been left in Egypt, there's every possibility that Egyptians today would still have no idea about most of their own history or how to read their own ancient texts. You might dismiss this as paternalistic or white-savioury, but it's true nonetheless.

Even as recently as last year we had researchers finding things like https://www.ancient-origins.net/news-history-archaeology/babylonian-map-world-0021631 that simply wouldn't have happened without the British Museum's work. So, I'm inclined to cut them some slack.

[-] BNE 1 points 16 hours ago

You might dismiss this as paternalistic or white-savioury

And I will

[-] mrdown@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I wonder how many artifacts are stolen from France old colonies

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

Hmm...that's what Trump is doing in america as well. Prices higher for foreigners. Maybe the ~~money~~ world isn't so different after all.

[-] qevlarr@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Americans pay the tariff, dummy

[-] olympicyes@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

I think they mean higher prices at national parks for foreigners. Just announced. Japan is doing the same thing.

[-] BeardedBlaze@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Ah yes, lets gut the NPS, discourage foreigners to visit the US, then charge the few that do come more. Brilliant.

[-] qevlarr@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Alright, I didn't know. Still can't follow the conclusion "guess it can't be that bad"

[-] k0e3@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago

They never said that though.

[-] cron@feddit.org 8 points 3 days ago

How will they decide which ticket you get? Do you need a passport to enter the Louvre?

[-] comrade_twisty@feddit.org 34 points 3 days ago

They‘ve been checking IDs since around 2001. Something major must have happened that year…

[-] HK65@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 days ago

It's pretty normal to need different ID cards to use some services in the EU.

You need student ID for student tickets, on the train if there is a senior or a youth discount they check for ID.

If you are an EU citizen, your ID is valid everywhere in the EU, no passport needed.

[-] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 11 points 3 days ago

Usually they just ask. A lot of museums in EU are free for EU citizens. I was never asked to prove I'm from EU, only asked. Other museum are free for city residents and in those they do ask for an ID.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2025
277 points (100.0% liked)

World News

50987 readers
2119 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS