As someone who tries to eat less meat in general because climate change and cows are basically giant grass eating slightly smellier dogs, I cannot take anyone who unironically uses "carnist" and "bloodmouth" seriously from that point on.

The more names you use to describe "person who eats meat" that you think are insulting and derogatory, the more people roll their eyes and move on with their planned meal.

Really ridiculous how vegans think this will put off any meat eaters from eating meat.

Actually it's having the opposite effect, it just infuriates people and makes them hungry.

I myself am hungry for a chicken now!

I think it's totally natural for humans to eat meat. But also definitely more moral to abstain from eating it.

Then we use the liquid remains of their children to coat them in crumbs.

“Bloodmouth carnist food?” What an idiot.

I am perfectly fine with the knowledge that my stomach is a graveyard.

I mean it objectively is going to be savoury and presumably the addition of the word "sweet" on the packaging means they've probably put something sweet on it making it as a point of fact, also sweet. Likewise, "rotting" is basically inaccurate unless you opt for a meaning of the term that basically encompasses all food. Seems correct enough to say it's a "carcus" I guess.

It's an ultimately pretty stupid approach to vociferously decry meat on the grounds of inherent disgustingness because it is self evident that people like it and are biologically inclined to eat it. There's entirely better reasons to criticise the choice to do so, but this is such a waste of time.

Dissolve in the acids inside of meee*

I suddenly want a chicken sandwich