51
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] boozook@mastodon.gamedev.place 4 points 6 days ago

@dgerard, oh nice quote-repost recursion. 👍🏻

[-] blakestacey@awful.systems 9 points 1 week ago

AI preprints : peer review :: Scott Aaronson : cops

[-] lagrangeinterpolator@awful.systems 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

You'd think peer review would make things better here, but big ML conferences have to deal with an absurd amount of submissions these days. NeurIPS this year got over 21000. The system they use for reviews is that anyone who submits a paper is required to review a certain number of other papers. So yeah, your ML paper is getting reviewed by other people who happen to submit their own papers. Who are competing with you to get their own papers accepted. Yeah, no problems there.

[-] dgerard@awful.systems 3 points 6 days ago

and they're all using chatbots in their methodology and for the mandatory reviews

[-] dgerard@awful.systems 7 points 1 week ago

hey hey hey!! there's always making it a Conference Proceeding

[-] zogwarg@awful.systems 6 points 1 week ago
The power, of words:
Is all but naught, if not heard.
And a bot, cannot.
[-] bluetea@ioc.exchange 4 points 1 week ago

@dgerard I hate everything.

this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2025
51 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

2311 readers
69 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS