514
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] justdaveisfine@piefed.social 163 points 1 week ago

Just take those exact characters, give them different hair colors, match the personality to the hair color, boom you got a slice of life show that has a strong first season but then fades in quality and takes a weird turn in season 2+3 before a mediocre season 4 that fans try to justify but everyone really hates.

WyVvqrKmOYMVCaC.jpg

[-] HexaBack 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

those hair colors, is this a DV-i reference or something

edit: the personalities match as well wtf

[-] ameancow@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

This is every generic anime.

[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 72 points 1 week ago

... and people get mad at me when I say this now bog standard, seemingly literally standardized anime art style is uninspired, boring, and fundamentally problematic.

[-] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Unrelated: did you know that the term "bog standard" comes from the term "box standard" which means, essentially, vanilla. No modifications or additions, just the basic version in the box. This used to be on the boxes for things people bought.

Now it basically means the same thing but to a none native speaker bog standard would likely not make much sense, where box standard has the context in the term.

[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago

I genuinely did not know that.

Makes complete sense though!

... and yes, English is a ridiculous nonsense language, we can and routinely do things like verb(ify) nouns, we have tons of idioms and slang that well... barely even make sense to many native speakers... we have tons of homophones like threw through, their there they're... etc...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 10 points 1 week ago

That has been my problem with many Animes for many years. There is a boring sameness in many designs that just drive me away.

everything is fundamentally problematic if you want to see a problem in everything.

[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Are you implying my tastes are a result of intentional cyncism?

They are not.

I just get bored of looking at the same thing all the time.

Thats not like, an active choice I am making.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
[-] Zachariah@lemmy.world 60 points 1 week ago

Oh really? Have you ever seen a person in the shape of a rhomboid?

[-] Deconceptualist@leminal.space 38 points 1 week ago

Your mother was a rhomboid

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

MY mother was a rhomboid, you insensitive clod

[-] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

And your father smelt of irregular polyhedrons

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Lembot_0005@lemy.lol 46 points 1 week ago

But those are the same picture...

[-] Gladaed@feddit.org 37 points 1 week ago

No. They are very much not. All are rather fit though.

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago

Thry're like 3% different.

[-] Gladaed@feddit.org 7 points 1 week ago

I feel like they are actually different body types as opposed to weight differences. That being said they are still narrow. But that's not my point.

[-] Anivia@feddit.org 8 points 1 week ago

If by "fit" you mean slim. None of these women look like they work out

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Korval@lemmy.today 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yep, I'm afraid Gladaed is right; definitely different pictures. When she posed for the sketches, she did something different with her arms each time. She sometimes changed her expression too. Oh, and one day she wore a shorter shirt.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] KazuyaDarklight@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago

I think this would be incrementally less ridiculous if they hadn't, presumably, scaled the images causing them all to be the same size/height on the page.

[-] Deconceptualist@leminal.space 37 points 1 week ago

Don't forget to give the eyes 10x the surface area of what's biologically possible

[-] SCmSTR 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

In a lot of Asia, youth is seen as attractive

Human eyeballs are generally all the same size, regardless of skull or body size.

Youth = small

Big eyes and small everything else therefore means cute

Art often exaggerates or interprets

Anime is art

Anime is also not a new medium at all in Japanese, and now global culture, and has had a lot of time to evolve

I'm not defending it, just explaining it, in case people don't understand, because this is a long-standing and very common complaint/criticism

[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

But we could have like, a whole anime done in the style of Ukiyo-E, for characters design style motifs, for facial and body proportions..

You could mock up a 3D model and cel shade these to work out how they'd work from different angles.

This is certainly an exaggerated interpretation of reality.

It is also certainly Japanese.

These were also largely seen as depictions of beautiful, desirable people.

Here, this one's from 1932,

The eyes are getting bigger, but noses still exist, the facial proportions are actually pretty close to realistic, if not just completely realistic, unlike in the modern standard anime style.

I dunno, I guess the modern standard anime style is just much much more neotenous (oversized heads, relatively oversized eyes, relatively undersized/unemphaszed noses) because it is meant to appeal primarily to small children, who are themselves neotenous?

Whereas the consumer base for Ukiyo-E would have been primarily adults?

[-] Little8Lost@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

One of the earliest "modern" manga artists got influenced by the large eyes of disney and other western comics and shows
And others adapted it

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MotoAsh@piefed.social 10 points 1 week ago

"Biologically possible", I mean, quite a few animals have eyes taking up a ton of their headspace. Owls for starters.

[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 week ago

... Unless you are planning on hybridizing an owl and a human, in pursuit of growing your own GMO Waifu...

I think we can safely assume the scope of the context is 'a human being'.

[-] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Jokes on you, artist "GeGeGek" nearly perfected that already.

An owl drawn to look like an anime girl

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] klemptor@startrek.website 27 points 1 week ago

Why are they all pigeon-toed?

[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 week ago

You accidentally double posted, but yes, that is uh... odd.

Bent in knees are cutesy as a pose, but as a fundamental skeletal attribute, they're ... kinda problematic.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

That's what I love about Japan, so much variety. >_>

[-] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 24 points 1 week ago

I never noticed before that all girls are knock-kneed.

[-] kilgore_trout@feddit.it 9 points 1 week ago

It's somehow preferred in Japan.

[-] obsoleteacct@lemmy.zip 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Having worked with vendors in the print industry, I'm wondering if at least some of this is a scaling issue in the edit. Because the "tall and thin" type is exactly the same height as the rest.

Maybe there was a version that was more distinct, and a layout guy standardized them without seeing or reading the copy.

Maybe that's too much benefit of the doubt.

[-] OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

At that point, the layout person is either a dumbass or doesn't read English.

[-] obsoleteacct@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago

Or maybe can't even see the copy. They may be looking at lorem ipsum.

[-] pseudo@jlai.lu 20 points 1 week ago

"well-balanced propotions" that's comic.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago
[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The second doesn't have the coveted "thigh gap", signaling that you are sufficiently anorexic. The third has the faintest shadow of muscle definition in her biceps and calves. The fourth remembered to wear socks, a thing only tall people do

The fourth remembered to wear socks, a thing only tall people do

she's wearing socks because she has so little fat on her body, she's cold all the time. so she needs extra clothing.

[-] Burninator05@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Frigging tall girls and their (checks notes) socks. Why do they ALWAYS wear them.

[-] Lightsong@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

One is missing an eye. Sucks to be her.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

thought the title said booty types, I am slightly disappointed (in myself)

[-] Entertainmeonly 10 points 1 week ago

that's what "athletic" means?

[-] Ephera@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago

I think, they miscounted. It's actually 4 billion body types, not just 4.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2025
514 points (100.0% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

8280 readers
52 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS