384
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene said she will introduce a bill to end H-1B visas, which allow companies to bring skilled foreign workers, days after Donald Trump backed the program.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Broadfern@lemmy.world 136 points 3 weeks ago

Ahahahahahaha

It’s counterproductive and racist all around but holy hell is it funny when these goobers fight each other.

[-] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 21 points 3 weeks ago

Dude they turned on her so hard for just not pivoting when Daddy did. Bless these cult antics

[-] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 45 points 3 weeks ago

The program doesn't need to end, it needs to have severe restrictions on use.

[-] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 26 points 3 weeks ago

Americans can totally do all these high skill jobs they just need some training!

Usually starting with an engineering degree...

[-] tornavish@lemmy.cafe 12 points 3 weeks ago
[-] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 3 points 3 weeks ago

"There is no Royal Road to Geometry, Your Highness"

[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago

It's not just the skills but the pay. H1-Bs are not too far off from slave labor since the person is tied to the company. H1Bs should be allowed to switch employers (after some initial trial period) and it will make them more expensive to keep, leveling the playing field with US workers.

[-] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 2 points 3 weeks ago

leveling the playing field with US workers.

Why would the powers that be want that lmao

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Playing “Who is the more extreme patriot?” Trump went in like an aimless wrecking ball, she’s going to do precision extreme moves. Bet she runs for prez. All or nothing.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

She might want to heed Michelle Obama's warning...

[-] SippyCup@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 weeks ago

The first female president will be a Republican, and she'll be horrifying. MTG might fit that bill.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

We’ll see if the monster she helped create crushes her, or, if for some bizarre reason trump doesn't run again, Republicans hate Democrats enough to vote for a woman.

[-] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago

What kind of special insight does a former first lady have to the American electorate?

[-] Stabbitha@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

She says they're not ready for a female president.

[-] pulsey@feddit.org 4 points 2 weeks ago

What if both parties only have female candidates though

[-] ameancow@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It is very, very much on-brand for establishment democrats to ignore the multitude of well-respected, socialist or left-leaning politicians across our country, as well as the mandate that shows just how much people want inspiring leaders who want to help people, and go all-in on Harris/Newsom 2028.

[-] tym@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

I'd stay out of public spaces if that happens tbvh.. everyone jokes about the byproducts of unkempt male rage, yet it has defined all of human existence. Susan Faludi has an awesome book on the subject called "Stiffed" that peels back the curtain on what happens to boys who aren't loved.

[-] ameancow@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

We have simultaneously underestimated the massive force that is male sexual insecurity and how it fuels movements, and also way overplayed the minority of foul shits who scream their hate into the void.

If a woman is elected president, there will be no end to raging lunatics online, but not any more than we have now, and there's not going to be any more or less real-world violence as a result. People generally fall in line with whatever tone our current "leader" sets.

[-] tym@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Couldn't agree more! They have mommy issues and would probably settle in well after an adjustment period

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] shiroininja@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago

Honestly., I really think workers should be able to move through borders like water. All it should take is applying for a job, getting the job, and moving (and filling out so the proper tax documents, etc before you start working.)

[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 weeks ago

Are you a globalist? What you say makes perfect sense. I'm a globalist too. Being a globalist is the end result of societal progression, not some evil cabal. Everyone on earth should shoot for globalism and then the planet would be running on all cylinders.

[-] shiroininja@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Pretty much I guess. I just think it’s a human right to be able to move freely and that nations and borders are just arbitrary things.

[-] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

My current employer is headquartered in Austin, TX. We have software engineers, QA engineers, and other technical people working remotely all over the world, including Germany, Ukraine, India, Australia, and elsewhere.

[-] Kronusdark@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Ending H-1B will only further accelerate domestic layoffs for outsourced talent. 🙄

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

There is no law of nature that could not be taxed accordingly, too, but the country needs to have this option presented as part of the conversation.

That threat is always thrown out there to keep people from questioning H-1B as if we need to answer to wayward corporations, instead of the other way around...

[-] BanMe@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

Do not discount her, she's keenly sensing a disruption and looking to create a schism. Pay attention to her statements now basically "I just want everyone to be kind to each other, I am sorry I participated in the divisive politics of yesterday." This will ring a bell with a lot of folks in the rural areas. Then she leaps on his anti-populist mistake. I think we might be looking at the next leader of the party.

[-] TheJesusaurus@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago

Honestly.... It would be so fitting.

America deserves its first cro-magnon president now that they make up such a huge portion of the USA

[-] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 9 points 2 weeks ago

H-1B visas are how our universities fill crucial teaching roles. Ending them would be disastrous to American higher education.

[-] AquaTofana@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

To this administration, that would be a feature not a bug.

[-] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago

Perhaps there could be a better way to fill those crucial teaching roles?

[-] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 2 points 2 weeks ago

Here's the problem with that, when your university is trying to hire the foremost expert in (field of study) and they are not from the US, that means there isn't an American that can fill that role. H-1B visas are how that gets done. Why would you hire less than the best?

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago

You need a professional degree or Masters or PhD to qualify for H1-B, with a job offer. i.e. no one who ever voted for MTG has ever been effected by an H1B visa holder.

[-] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

Force the university to pay 10x the mean salary. That way the university is disincentivized to abuse the program. If he is truly the foremost expert in whatever field, then his salary should be a drop in the bucket compared to the grants he will need to actually do his research and it shouldn't be a big deal.

[-] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 3 points 2 weeks ago

Do you understand that universities have to compete to get these people as it is? Go back to stacking boxes man

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Maybe the visas should be tailored to only that, then. Or come up with a specialist visa meant entirely for that.

As is, they are also used by IT bros...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

I have long thought - since the 90s - that the H-1B program needs a lot of oversight and a revamping on exactly how it is governed, but I don't for a minute think that MTG understands the nuance here. Trying to talk about this in certain company is always fun, because it's like trying to talk about Israel in the early 90s - you'd get accused of being a nativist or whatever immediately w/ almost no thought, just like talking about Israel in frank terms would get people called "antisemitic". It seems that, like the Israel thing, it's kind of broken through into the national conversation at least vs. just people within IT only. Unfortunately, it seems to be nativists like Bannon and MTG trying to make the counter H-1B arguments, and I hate that.

If we really cannot find local talent for an endeavor, and it is truly something that is rather time-bound, sure, bring in people for 3-6 years, I guess.

But I think the terms that the person is under should not be something where they have much reliance on the good graces of a company. And I think finding easy paths for them to transition to full citizenship if they so wish should be there. And I think the requirement should be that they are paid 2x what the going rate here might be.

But using these visas for cheap labor for companies to exploit in things like programming jobs - most especially in a crappy job market exacerbated by things like AI - well, hell to the no. We have PLENTY of that talent in this country, FFS. Companies just want to suppress the cost of doing business here.

And for people saying that this is the alternative as opposed to shipping jobs overseas - bullshit, we can tax the shit out of overseas services, too. Apparently, Pedonald is even able to do such things as tariffs on goods without an act of Congress; it would be something that could be done on services as well.

[-] shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I can't speak for the tech industry only the system as a whole.

I think people calling it slavery or likening it to some kind of bonded labor are obviously exaggerating to a degree.

The only situation where its clearly problematic are for countries like China and India that have massive populations but still have the same green card cap as a nation a tenth of their size.

Everyone else on an H1b would generally be working towards a green card on a timeline of 3-5 years. Yes mobility is limited during that time (though not absolutely so) but I can't think of a country on earth where new immigrants don't have to work with their hands tied to a degree.

Right now employers only have to pay the prevailing wage to an H1b employee. This can be significantly less than the median.

I think the median should be the absolute floor. One can make an argument to have 75th percentile be the floor also.

I think if a company is allowed to pay below median wage for a large number of employees they should be forced to invest in local education / apprenticeship. Even if they are allowed to, there should be strict caps on this.

There are many H1bs that get paid above the median wage in the US but I think conversations around the tech sector tend to dominate so the perception is that these are mostly lower wage entry level workers. It's really the tech sector that has exploited the system the most so I think it's worthwhile distinguishing tech H1bs and therefore considering more significant restrictions on a sectoral level.

[-] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 weeks ago

It is very close to slavery. Your employer gets absolute power over you and your immigration status. "You're fired" means "you need to leave everything you built and everyone you love behind".

Are you gonna risk leaving your family behind and being banned from the country to join a union? To protest bad work conditions.

It is a scourge of a system that legitimizes the exploitation of immigrants.

[-] Asidonhopo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Are you gonna risk leaving your family behind and being banned from the country to join a union? To protest bad work conditions.

Since this is the tech industry, I'd add, to protest unethical practices towards end users?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

17ish years in tech here…

H1-B’s at one of my previous companies (2015-2017) were regularly working 70+ hours a week and getting paid less than new hires coming out of college.

They often were either isolated, or stuck within their one self made cliques of other H1-Bs from their country of origin. They did not try to socialize or make friends. More often than not, they’d leave and go home within 2 years. You could feel the despair and unhappiness.

Aside from how it impacted the H1-Bs (which from what I saw was almost all negative and fucked up), I wasn’t thrilled about seeing a multi-billion dollar org making so much extra money, and then not really distributing it correctly.

The H1-B thing helped one group of people to the detriment of everyone else at that org. I’m pretty sure you can figure out the only group that it benefited.

[-] shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

This sounds more like H1b fraud (failure to meet prevailing wage for hours worked) on the part of the company rather than an issue with the H1b visa itself. More oversight is certainly necessary to ensure American companies don't break the law.

[-] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Ya, it really may have been.

[-] sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

Is there no middle ground, like keep the program but invest in education and tax incentives for hiring from US universities?

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

I think there are lots of options that could be explored. One is if these are for truly research types of things, maybe keep a smaller amount of the visas, but only for that. And make it easy for them to become full citizens if they wish. Make it easy for them to float between entities (corps, universities) so that they are truly free agents in the marketplace, etc., even if they don't opt for citizenship.

Another would be to find ways to fast-track truly rare talent right to a path to citizenship that is not tied to an entity at all. Or maybe it is, but for maybe three months as a trial run, then they are full citizens free to work for anyone (or not at all, or go to school again), and vote, etc...

But as for stacking the deck for corporations with lots of compliant cheap labor to be used in IT and engineering, keep American workers in line, and drive down wages....nah.

The supposed aims and the rationales given for the H-1B are easily punctured the minute you ask - wait a minute, if these are such precious commodities that cannot be found here, why the fuck would we send them packing in 3 to 6 years? Why wouldn't we do everything possible to entice them to stay and become full citizens? Surely they'll end up starting up businesses of their own, etc...it's truly the American dream. Why are we subbing a 3 - 6 year gig for the American dream, FFS?

[-] sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

I live in a part of the country where I frequently compete for work (or did before I started a business) against candidates from all over the world. These are not roles that can be done by a unique, small set of people - it's like marketing manager type roles. So something needs to be adjusted - even just a little.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 points 3 weeks ago

The H1B program is broken because it ties employees to their employers; it needs to be replaced with at least a work visa model with more freedom for immigrant workers.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2025
384 points (100.0% liked)

politics

26580 readers
1830 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS