349
submitted 6 days ago by MuskyMelon@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Orange Jabba hating on his people

top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 143 points 6 days ago

What an interesting idea, America. Maybe the EU needs to adopt a reciprocal policy. Perhaps add in visa rejections for unvaccinated Americans. Actually, let's prioritize the latter and do that first.

[-] dharmacurious@slrpnk.net 22 points 6 days ago

I mean, as a fatty who genuinely hopes to get to the EU one day, I pray they don't do that. But for unvaccinated folk? Unless it's for a legitimate medical reason, they absolutely should.

[-] Zorsith 12 points 6 days ago

They've already started limiting who can get certain vaccines like COVID in the US, that would just create another way to keep people in the country. Creating a vaccine tourism industry would be smart though; discount vacations under the guise of "being under medical observation" for a few days if you're getting vaccinated.

[-] Reyali@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

Small note: in the end, access to COVID vaccines has not been limited. There was swirl around this that made it seem like they would be, but then the CDC landed on guidance that basically boils down to, “it’s an individual’s choice with the guidance of their healthcare provider.”

I was livid about the swirl because I am an immunocompromised person while my partner is not, and the initial guidance implied he would not have access to the vaccine, despite living with me.

I want everyone who can get vaccinated to do so, and so it’s important to me to stop the perception that anyone is restricted from accessing it.

[-] Jumpropegazing@lemmy.zip 8 points 6 days ago

No, the point is that they're limiting it by saying that its up to an individual and their professional because that gives leeway for insurance companies to choose not to cover the vaccine by having their own doctors argue against it.

And then you would have to take them to court to get them to actually pay which never happens majority of the time so by default peoples vaccinations are generally a lot less likely to continue being covered. Many people that could get the vaccine free before are either losing coverage soon or are only being guaranteed coverage through 2026 with no plans on after.

[-] Zorsith 2 points 6 days ago

Exactly. I was told up front if insurance denied it I would be paying about $200-$300.

[-] Jumpropegazing@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 days ago

yea its horrible even in canada ive heard about the scariness of it all, and similar things are happening with other vaccines for children its absolutely fucked

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Is that in every state, though? I thought some states and some companies were following anti-vaxxer nonsense and demanding that people under a certain age (65?) had to have some precondition.

[-] Reyali@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Yes, this summarizes the latest guidance:

On September 19, 2025, the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) voted to change what had been a universal COVID-19 vaccine recommendation (except for HHS’ recent change for those under age 18) to “shared clinical decision-making”, including for those 65 and older. For those under 65, ACIP added that the assessment should include “an emphasis that the risk-benefit of vaccination is most favorable for individuals who are at an increased risk for severe COVID-19 disease and lowest for individuals who are not at an increased risk, according to the CDC list of COVID-19 risk factors.” These recommendations, should they be adopted by the CDC Director, mean that all individuals are recommended to have an individual assessment and interaction with a health care provider to determine whether getting a COVID-19 vaccination is recommended for them. If that determination is made, insurers should cover the vaccine at no-cost, although it is possible that some consumers may face challenges. (source)

So the change is that it’s no longer routinely recommended for everyone, but it’s supported if the patient and healthcare professional agree. Simplicity of access varies and some states have mandated that a pharmacist qualifies to make this decision, while others haven’t, but as long as you don’t have a doctor who is anti-vax, you should be able to get one.

More info from the CDC here about what “shared clinical decision-making” means.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Yeah, I'm pretty sure my state (Colorado) took special measures to not even require some "precondition" that you or your doctor have to make up. Last I looked, in Colorado, at least with certain vendors, you don't even have to lie and say you are overweight, etc., and you can just go to Walgreen's, Krogers, etc...and get the vaccine, although you probably (?) have to pay for it?

While I have zero problem with lying because a corrupted government came along and required it, I don't know with 100% certainty that insurance companies won't use that against me later, so for that reason alone, I'd rather not make up some phony precondition.

[-] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 7 points 6 days ago

Perhaps add in visa rejections for unvaccinated Americans

Is this not already a thing? Honestly can't remember.

[-] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 4 points 6 days ago

If the US bans vaccines, Americans wanting to visit Europe can fly to Colombia, get vaccinated for free at the airport, and then fly to Europe.

[-] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 42 points 6 days ago

Says the fat man that is the son of an illegal immigrant.

[-] Stamau123@lemmy.world 67 points 6 days ago

We should be thin like Goering, blonde like Hitler, and tall like Goebbels

[-] SnotFlickerman 59 points 6 days ago

Enough projection for an IMAX theater.

[-] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 6 days ago

For a drive in planetarium.

[-] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago

Fat pedo says what?

[-] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 27 points 6 days ago

Call ICE on Trump.

[-] goldenquetzal@lemmy.world 26 points 6 days ago

"They require expensive long term care"? Who gives a fuck, it's not like our medical system will pay for it anyway. What the hell is this nonsense

[-] ryper@lemmy.ca 36 points 6 days ago

Is ICE going to start targeting fat people for deportation next?

[-] tornavish@lemmy.cafe 35 points 6 days ago

Wouldn’t that be self deportation?

[-] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 15 points 6 days ago

Fat Spiderman meme.

[-] CodingCarpenter@lemmy.ml 16 points 6 days ago

Good luck we're harder to kidnap

[-] gdog05@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

Especially if we put a bit of grease on us. Perhaps from a pizza or fried chicken.

[-] y0kai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 6 days ago

It takes at least two of them fighting with all of their untrained might to take down a 110lb woman, there's no way they're arresting fat people.

[-] Jumpropegazing@lemmy.zip 22 points 6 days ago

crazy that tubby is talkin

[-] MourningDove@lemmy.zip 26 points 6 days ago

This is the rot calling the kettle fat.

[-] 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca 11 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

LOL this cant be real

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 20 points 6 days ago

He's already running a national weight loss program for the poor, and he doesn't want fat foreigners coming in and skewing his data.

Weight loss programs are expensive, he's such a nice president for offering that to our poor citizens. He really cares.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago

Killing the US tourism industry, slice by slice. I hope they are thankful for it.

[-] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 days ago

It's not already dead? I'm pretty sure it died six months ago.

[-] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 12 points 6 days ago

Rich how the people cheering this on would be victims themselves.

[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago

Says the fat bastard of presidents

[-] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 days ago

I think that's actually Taft but Trump may come in 2nd.

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 7 points 5 days ago

How can it waste our medical resources when the government doesn't pay for our healthcare? lol

However, fat orange pedos who wear shit-filled diapers are welcome.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 5 days ago

What do you bet that a fat Russian oligarch is more than welcome?

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 6 points 6 days ago

So long, then.

[-] Pistcow@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago
[-] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 2 points 6 days ago

Thanks for the laugh

[-] SCmSTR 2 points 5 days ago

Am I dreaming?

[-] FerretyFever0@fedia.io 4 points 6 days ago

Fascinating. I see absolutely no issues, what a perfect idea!

[-] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 3 points 6 days ago

Usually countries just make long term visa holders buy private health insurance, so really no excuses here.

this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2025
349 points (100.0% liked)

News

33137 readers
3900 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS