237
submitted 2 days ago by Grimpen@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca

Peter Navarro wants to increase pressure on country that Donald Trump has threatened to annex

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] holdstrong@lemm.ee 14 points 21 hours ago

On some level I’m glad he’s also going after Germany, Denmark, Ukraine etc. At least we’re not alone in this.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 11 points 23 hours ago

Why would I even need Canada when I can already monitor Russia by looking out the window of my house?

[-] qaeta@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 hours ago

That's not really the purpose of Five Eyes. Sure it does that, but the main reason for it is to circumvent restrictions on spying on your own citizens. Instead they get someone else (like Canada) to spy for them and pass the info along.

[-] tiefling 7 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Sarah Palin? When did you figure out Lemmy? /s

[-] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 2 points 15 hours ago

Oh they're really serious about this aren't they

[-] awake01@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago

I would remove America immediately. It's basic common sense.

[-] Yezzey@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago

Pretty sure the 3 other eyes will be on our side.

[-] spudsrus@aussie.zone 1 points 21 hours ago

Most of our citizens... Probably.

Spineless Government... Probably not.

[-] qaeta@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 hours ago

Every member except the US has the same head of state. Pretty sure that head of state isn't going to kick out part of the commonwealth for a rebellious and unreliable colony.

[-] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago

Article seems to have a hard paywall? Even 12ft.io can't bypass it.

[-] bartleby1@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago
[-] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 10 points 22 hours ago

Navarro did not respond to requests for comment. After the FT’s article was first published, Navarro denied pushing the idea, which he said was “crazy stuff”. “We would never ever jeopardise our national security . . . with allies like Canada,” Navarro said.

That is a full walkback if it was ever said originally. Doesn't make it time to trust the US on anything, though.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Peter Navarro’s out of prison?

[-] Grimpen@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago

He's gained valuable experience, he's an integral member of Trump's inner circle.

[-] athairmor@lemmy.world 104 points 2 days ago

I’d hazard to guess that they got wind that other four are thinking of kicking out the USA and are trying to get ahead of it.

The Five Eyes are supposed to be a bulwark against Russia and, later, terrorists. Now that the USA is aligning with Russia, sharing intel with them doesn’t seem like such a good idea.

[-] Hugin@lemmy.world 65 points 2 days ago

Most members aren't allowed to spy on their own citizens without things like warrants. So they spy on the other members citizens and then share the info.

It's basically a way around citizen rights.

[-] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

So the question becomes, like so many others, are the benefits worth the risks? Being able to collect information on your citizens without saying you do by helping closely aligned countries do the same appears to have been worth the risk to the leaders of those (and other) countries. Doing that while also providing info about your allies to someone who isn't considered an ally or who they may be wary of is a different proposition.

I'd be happier if a lot of things could happen, including spying on your neighbors, or engaging in quid pro quo to provide a fig leaf on the idea of spying on your own citizens, but I imagine that isn't going to happen for a good long while.

[-] TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.ca 103 points 2 days ago

Don't threaten us with a good time. Snowden's leaks unveiled just how shady and corrupt this agreement is.

Also does the US even have an intelligence sector any more? Or have they all been fired and replaced with toe-sucking morons?

[-] veroxii@aussie.zone 24 points 2 days ago

Exactly. Do Australia next please!

[-] dankm@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Can't, sorry, I'm sure the Prime Minister would be removed again by your Governor-General if you tried :/

[-] pupbiru@aussie.zone 2 points 1 day ago

that’s … not really how that works

[-] Uberflussig@sh.itjust.works 2 points 23 hours ago
[-] pupbiru@aussie.zone 2 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

this is exactly how this should play out. the outcome might not be fair or ideal, however the whitlam government could not govern with the situation at the time after 2 attempts. in these situations, there are no good options: deferring power to the governor general to force a functional government is, imo, a better option than people fighting for control with violence or government shutdown etc… you can disagree, and that’s fine but in general i think that australian culture tends to side with my way of doing things, and it’s worked out for us so far

and no i’m not really interested in gaming out what ifs and multiverse theories of how things might have or will go in some arbitrary future because the reality of the situation right now is australia is a great place to live and the largest constitutional crisis ever ended in a pretty fine outcome in the long term and has never happened again

[-] dankm@lemmy.ca 2 points 18 hours ago

I was referring to the allegations that the GG had CIA ties: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alleged_CIA_involvement_in_the_Whitlam_dismissal, though both Whitlam and Kerr deny it.

In general the way that played out is fine, and we've had related issues pop up here in Canada too.

[-] pupbiru@aussie.zone 1 points 12 hours ago

and i completely agree - the CIA has its fingers way too far into australian politics, and i think there’s likely been a lot of modern examples of this too

but it’s not like the CIA can just up and replace our government with 1 weird trick lol

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago

sigh I take it america is getting kicked out then, fair enough

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago

Oh that was happening the second Trump used Putin's exact lines about the Ukraine war and put a person in charge of our intelligence that's widely seen as a Russian asset.

This will just make it happen faster.

[-] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 1 points 20 hours ago

How does he get to pick the head of Canadian intelligence?

[-] jaemo@sh.itjust.works 64 points 2 days ago

For the next 4 years, at least, ANY ALLIANCE WITH THE US IS A SECURITY RISK FOR US.

[-] Reannlegge@lemmy.ca 22 points 2 days ago

I am sorry to tell you but it is going to be that way for much longer than four years, not that I think Trump will last more than four years he may but that is a question for later. I do however see the next administration holding a grudge against Canada for a much longer time as we do more to avoid the US as they have shown to be a less than favourable partner.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

These links are made in a way where they can just be dropped every 4 years. This is going to be lasting damage.

[-] TraipsersWill@lemmy.world 42 points 2 days ago

US intelligence agencies are now entirely compromised by the actions of Don QHoaxer de la Maga. Any data received by them will be swiftly traded off to unfriendly powers, while any data from them will be so riddled with disinformation as to be useless.

[-] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

And even when Trump is gone, the American people have shown their commitment to electing fascists so the USA should be considered untrustworthy for decades to come.

[-] Grimpen@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 days ago

Not even getting good value in trade. Just get dinner at Mar A Lago, and use the bathroom in back of the jacuzzi or whatever.

[-] jacksilver@lemmy.world 38 points 2 days ago

There was an article the other day about kicking out the UK, who's going to be left at this rate.

[-] Grimpen@lemmy.ca 43 points 2 days ago

With Tulsi Gabbard as the US Director of National Intelligence, how much do we want to leak to Russia?

[-] voytrekk@sopuli.xyz 11 points 2 days ago

Australia and New Zealand, who Russia doesn't really care about.

This president has been such a disgrace to the intelligence community.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Nougat@fedia.io 23 points 2 days ago

Nobody tell Little t that NORAD is a joint Canada-US operation.

[-] Reannlegge@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 days ago

Well how else are we supposed to track Santa? /s

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 days ago

They've not forgotten about NORAD, and I wish I could say more than that, but I would get people in trouble if I did.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 9 points 2 days ago

If you truly know something which you are not allowed to speak publicly about, you may be in a position to "do something" with that information.

Godspeed, and I hope I never hear about your exploits.

[-] Katzelle3@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago

So they're gonna be called Four Eyes then?

[-] grey_maniac@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 days ago

Well, if they punt the US instead, we could just call it the Commonwealth. How about the Commonwealth Intelligence Agencies?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] nyan@lemmy.cafe 15 points 2 days ago

At the rate the US is going, they're going to end up calling it "Cyclops".

[-] lost_faith@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Good 'ol One Eye

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 days ago

Don't worry folk, we have more than enough experience at this.

America's intelligence gathering apparatus is essentially the creation of Canada.

the first commandant was Lt. Col. Arthur Terence Roper-Caldbeck.[9] Colonel William "Wild Bill" Donovan, war-time head of the OSS, credited Stephenson with teaching Americans about foreign intelligence gathering.[6] The CIA even named their recruit training facility "The Farm", a nod to the original farm that existed at the Camp X site.[10]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camp_X

He is best known by his wartime intelligence code name, Intrepid. Many people consider him to be one of the real-life inspirations for James Bond.[1] Ian Fleming himself once wrote, "James Bond is a highly romanticised version of a true spy. The real thing is... William Stephenson."[2]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Stephenson

For further reading, check out the book, "A Man Called Intrepid"

[-] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Now that the James Bond franchise is dead someone should get on making a movie franchise about Stephenson.

[-] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago

Peter Navarro can go fuck himself right in his One Brown Eye

[-] Grimpen@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 days ago

Just a report on beyond the scenes chatter from within Trump's inner circle.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2025
237 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

8067 readers
970 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS