101
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The pain is coherent. They blame politicians which is correct. But they fail to see it’s the system that perpetuates the problems. Then project their misery on minority groups and the disadvantaged. Oliver sings-

“So they think you don’t know. But I think that you do.”

But they don’t. And that’s the problem.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

He also blames "welfare queens." And calls them fat.

[-] MasterObee@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

He says we have a bunch of people starving, and we have programs to help, but instead of helping, he sees the programs being abused.

Do you not think these programs are being abused? Have you been to the south where poverty and obesity are at insane rates?

Also, it's hilarious how he can touch on 20 issues that every one of us agree with, but the left hyper-focuses on one line they don't like, because he just looks like a hillbilly trump supporter to y'all.

[-] Rilichu@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"Also, it's hilarious how he can touch on 20 issues that every one of us agree with, but the left hyper-focuses on one line they don't like, because he just looks like a hillbilly trump supporter to y'all."

That's sorta the problem of right wing populism dude. Yeah, many of the issues pointed out in the song are legitimate and need to be addressed but how he tacks on "welfare queens" is trying to shift the blame onto people have nothing to do with your own hardships. That family getting $400 a month in food stamps is not the reason everything sucks right now.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Signtist@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago

I listened to his song before I knew anything about him, and I was into it until that point, but yeah, when you make a song about rich people exploiting you, but then spend half the song talking about the much less impactful issue of poor people wasting their government-issued money on junk food, your message stops being effective.

It's like stubbing your toe and breaking your arm at the same time, and complaining just as much about both.

[-] MasterObee@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

but then spend half the song

Once again, hyperfocusing on one line is not 'half the song' and when you put it in context, he's simply saying that those people that need welfare aren't getting it, while others are abusing the system. It's not just about making laws to help poor people, it's about ensuring that it gets to the people that need it.

[-] btaf45@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

He is redirecting anger that rightfully should be aimed at the overclass to the underclass. The underclass is not causing his problems. It is the overclass.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] starrox@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Education folks... education. Prime example here why it is so, so important to be able to think critically.

[-] TaterTurnipTulip@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Have you taken the time to look into why there's such an obesity problem? It sure seems like the singer hasn't, otherwise he wouldn't be denigrating poor people for being obese.

EBT doesn't pay much and the cheaper foods are chock full of terrible ingredients that tend to lead to obesity. It's not easy to afford good fruit, vegetables, grains, etc when you've got a small amount of money that has to stretch a lot.

If it weren't for the myth of the welfare queen we might be in a better place to provide for people in need. And there will ALWAYS be people in need in a capitalist society. It's how it works.

Honestly, a bit of empathy and understanding would go a long ways for people so upset about people on welfare.

[-] scottywh@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I can't even see you but I can tell you look like a "hillbilly trump supporter" too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

I like fudge rounds. And I’m not fat or on welfare. Checkmate ginger. Lol

[-] MasterObee@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Then project their misery on minority group

Where did this happen? You're just making this up.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This song is just manufactured crap. The people who brought you Fox News have figured out that their audience also listens to country music.

https://www.distractify.com/p/who-is-oliver-anthony

[-] psychothumbs@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

The whole thing with mysterious producers approaching him out of nowhere when he's at his lowest point to get him to record a faux-populist song that really reinforces conservative power is very Black Mirror.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago
[-] Franzia 21 points 1 year ago

Calling it Populism is already giving them ground. It's Fake Populism. It's manufactured and funded by the elite class, rather than advocated for and created by the working class.

[-] shadowspirit@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Fake populism. What a bullshit statement. Populism is populism. The message either resonates or doesn't. The fact that we're discussing it suggests that it resonates. So what do we do about it? To agree with your argument is the reason why Trump became president. As a society we cannot discount discontent regardless of the ideology. There are a lot of pissed off people on this planet for various reasons. If the song or message didn't resonate we wouldn't be talking about it so it's not fake. A rich man paid for a poor man song. So who is the sucker? The person who believes it or the person who argues against it? It is what it is but it's not fake if you hold an opinion and that's the point.

I heard the song and like the beat and now I'm reading a thread where I feel like a bad person for enjoying a song for just being a song. Was in a thread earlier today about Sherman and the civil war. Has there ever been a war fought by the rich man on behalf of the poor man? The answer is no. At the extreme the question is are we willing to die for our beliefs?

There is a large swathe of people who are disenfranchised maybe we should care. The root cause is what is important but we often fall into debates about ideology without addressing the systemic issues.

My opinion is we have far more in common with the people around us than we care to or are capable of realizing. We all struggle so it's important to first empathize and then determine from what root these opinions are derived. Granted, some are fake but many are genuine.

EDIT: sorry, realize this became a wall of text and I'm half drunk and half-baked but I hope I made a coherent argument for both sides. If the discourse is civil it's a healthy conversation to have and an argument worth having. Have a good evening folks.

[-] crypticthree@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago
[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

An excellent take-down of the song’s philosophical underpinnings.

I disagree with the author’s skepticism about how this went viral though. As other commenters have indicated, it feels like the release was a little too well coordinated for some random YouTuber.

[-] AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

According to the Citations Needed podcast, it was an obscure video that was plucked up by a rightwing organization and promoted to be in everyone's feeds

[-] TheJims@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

You know he fucked an ostrich, right?

[-] Tolstoshev@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago
[-] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

I heard it was a sick ostrich.

[-] MasterObee@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Banger of a song. He's right, we need to talk about these issues:

  1. Working overtime and getting shitty pay

  2. Feeling like the life is being wasted paying bills, and the little bit of joy we get is through substance abuse

  3. Politicians enriching themselves by screwing Americans over

  4. Inflation being too high and what money that we do get in our paychecks having 30% taken out by the government.

  5. Politicians not looking out for the working class, but befriending and partying with Epstein trafficking minors.

  6. Young men dying at absurd rates due to suicide

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Did you read the article? It debunks at least half of the complaints you make

[-] shadowspirit@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

A friend shared the music with me and right off the rip I thought the song was a banger. It immediately fills a void left open by modern country. I didn't read into it nearly as much as some folks here are . .which is somewhat puzzling to me. It's country music it's always going to be a woe is me story. I'll listen to the words more closely next time.

I'm new to Lemmy so I'm not sure yet how to tag users but Bee is getting beat up a bit in this thread. I think part of the reason why this is getting so much traction is because it is good music. The debate is the message. Misplaced frustration isn't uncommon regardless of political belief. I think where exception is to be taken is when it pushes or promotes violence. The same debate was had about gangster rap and other forms of music years ago.

[-] MasterObee@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's weird that this song has gotten so much hate from the left. And the critique is always the same line about welfare, but you don't hear them quote the rest of the words of the song.

First off, right before the welfare line, he mentions there are too many Americans starving, he's saying that the welfare isn't being allocated properly. If you've walked through the south, you've seen this. Trashing the whole concept of the song because one line, that in a vacuum, some people on the right use to discredit welfare shouldn't be the goal.

I see so many comments saying we need to unite against the rich, and when a song goes viral saying to do that, he gets trashed because he looks like a republican. This song talks about:

  1. Working overtime and getting shitty pay

  2. Feeling like the life is being wasted paying bills, and the little bit of joy we get is through substance abuse

  3. Politicians enriching themselves by screwing Americans over

  4. Inflation being too high and what money that we do get in our paychecks having 30% taken out by the government.

  5. Politicians not looking out for the working class, but befriending and partying with Epstein trafficking minors.

  6. Young men dying at absurd rates due to suicide

Are these partisan issues? They seem like working class issues. Yeah, that welfare line I think is out of place, even if there may be some merit. But don't lose the forest staring at a tree. This is a protest song against how the politicians have treated the working class.

[-] psychothumbs@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

The issue with the song and with right wing populism generally is that it gets some of the complaints right, but points people in exactly the wrong direction in terms of looking for solutions. So it can be really maddening for people on the left because it's substituting for a correct analysis in a way that sabotages bringing the working class together.

[-] MasterObee@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

with right wing populism

What makes this right wing populism?

[-] psychothumbs@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

That's kind of what the whole article is spent laying out.

I thought this distinction between left and right populism from the article was useful:

As the political analyst John Judis has argued, this is more or less what distinguishes right populism from the left variety: Whereas left populism posits a binary between the people and the elites, right populism conjures a three-part division of society between “the people,” the elites, and the undeserving others whom the elites coddle at the people’s expense.

The song's complaints about working class life ring true, but then whenever it gets close to a political statement, whether about taxes, politicians, or welfare it never says anything a wealthy conservative would argue with.

[-] MasterObee@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That’s kind of what the whole article is spent laying out.

Please, enlighten me with your own thinking. Is it because he's saying some welfare programs are abused while the starving people who actually need help aren't getting it? What do you think of the topics he addresses in the other 98% of the song?

but then whenever it gets close to a political statement, whether about taxes, politicians, or welfare it never says anything a wealthy conservative would argue with.

Is that what your issue is? Lets see, Biden is a wealthy liberal and 50 million democrats voted with him. It's not about what a wealthy conservative or democrat would say, it's about experience. This man is experiencing working overtime, while seeing inflation run rampant, his paycheck getting deducted 30%, substance abuse, politicians having a rich peoples club, young male suicide rates and those needing help not getting it.

Is this different than the issues in the democratic run inner cities? I lived in seattle for 6 years, I can tell you the issues he's talked about are the same.

[-] psychothumbs@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

We seem to be going around in circles a bit. You're pointing to the various ways in which he speaks to legitimate complaints about the difficulties of life, which I've already agreed are valid. The problem is nothing he explicitly or implicitly suggests doing about those problems would actually help, and indeed the implied recommendations fit more with a conservative policy outlook that would be actively harmful to people with those problems.

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Stop being lazy. You're asking others to do the work for you seem then you're going to sound based on their summary. Read the article like the rest of us and you'll be on the same page.

[-] btaf45@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

What makes this right wing populism?

Redirecting justifiable anger at the overclass to the underclass is classic right wing "populism". It's very popular with the billionaires pulling your strings.

[-] btaf45@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Working overtime and getting shitty pay

And then redirecting anger that should go to the overclass to the underclass. The bottom line is that his song will help trick people into giving rich people get more gigantic GOP tax cuts and increase wealth inequality.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] steebo_jack@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

What happened to working hard and pulling yourself up? #bootstrapssarcasm...

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
101 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19148 readers
1796 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS