185
submitted 2 weeks ago by petsoi@discuss.tchncs.de to c/linux@lemmy.ml
top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] cygnus@lemmy.ca 58 points 2 weeks ago

Great, hopefully this high-profile move makes them change their name into something that can't be potentially pronounced 8 different ways. Forge-joe? Or more like Jorge-ho?

[-] anothermember@lemmy.zip 42 points 2 weeks ago

It comes from the Esperanto forĝejo meaning forge (noun, literally a site, ejo, where forging takes place). So soft g, and j as English y. /forˈd͡ʒe.jo/

https://forgejo.org/faq/

Not many names come from Esperanto so that's interesting. :)

[-] flubba86@lemmy.world 27 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

For anyone wondering, for a native English speaker, it's pronounced like "for-jay-yo".

[-] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 weeks ago

I think it's interesting but also still a terrible name. But I fear the time to change it is long gone.

[-] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 13 points 2 weeks ago

Why terrible? Because is not in English?

[-] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 weeks ago

Because like the op said- it's not clear how it's to be pronounced.

I've learned some Esperanto. Doesn't mean it's a great base for naming a project.

[-] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 8 points 2 weeks ago

Because like the op said- it's not clear how it's to be pronounced.

Because you are assuming everything should be pronounced as in English. Names can be in any language. It's on you if you assume English phonetics.

[-] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Dude, I speak like four languages. It's a dumb name in my opinion.

[-] cygnus@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago

And I speak three and am learning a fourth. It's just a bad name.

[-] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 1 week ago

Care to explain why? If it's objectively bad, you should have objective evidence for it. Do you?

[-] cygnus@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago
[-] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 1 week ago

So you're spewing nonsense. Good to know.

[-] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 1 week ago

That opinion probably has a reason, does it? What is it?

[-] zagaberoo@beehaw.org 8 points 2 weeks ago

A strange choice. You've got most people who will be confused by the odd spelling, and then you've got esperantists like me who get confused by the missing accent mark. Until now, just seeing it in passing I assumed it was a password manager or something because of 'forgesi'.

I am glad to see more Esperanto in the wild, though.

[-] anothermember@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago

Yeah, I don't disagree there, as somebody primed on Esperanto, familiar with the -ejo ending, it looks like an Esperanto word to me so my original instinct was to pronounce it in the Esperanto way but with the 'hard-g'. I guess to be fair they would have more problems if they asked everyone to write 'ĝ'.

[-] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 2 points 1 week ago

I guess to be fair they would have more problems if they asked everyone to write ‘ĝ’.

They could have used the old "gh" convention.

[-] Hexarei@programming.dev 3 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, even with my relatively limited Esperanto familiarity (mi estas ankoraŭ komencanto, sed mi povas legi kaj skribi iomete), I was originally confused by it as well when I started using it a few months ago. Then when I saw the explanation on the faq, I just found myself wondering why the heck they used g instead of ĝ.

[-] zagaberoo@beehaw.org 2 points 2 weeks ago

Bone skribis!

[-] theshatterstone54@feddit.uk 6 points 2 weeks ago

I've been pronouncing it For-ge-ho

for as in the word "for",

ge as in gecko

and ho as in ho-ho-ho!

[-] noddy@beehaw.org 2 points 1 week ago

I'll continue to call it forge joe. It's more cute. It's like "where do I put these files?" "Just give them to Joe, he'll know where to store them".

[-] semperverus@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

I've always been a fan of for-ged-joe (like forget Joe, but with a d instead of a t)

[-] flubba86@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

It's officially "for-jay-yo".

[-] cygnus@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago

Maybe it's more like for-gay-joe? Or for-gay-o? For-gee-o? For-gy-o? Who knows?

[-] Sickday@kbin.earth 2 points 2 weeks ago

For-gy-o

Now there's a winner. F-Orgy-O. Like a Federated Orgy.

[-] Earflap@reddthat.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

Forgejo-jo-jo

[-] devfuuu@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

I've always just read and called it forgero which always made sense to me. I never realised the letters were not those...

[-] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 1 points 2 weeks ago

Depends on your language.

[-] unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 2 weeks ago

Please ActivityPub federation in Forgejo!!

[-] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

If it’s going to be a name from a made up language, it should be in Klingon.

[-] gianni@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 weeks ago

All languages are made up.

[-] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 3 points 1 week ago

For Esperanto probably nobody will want royalties :)

this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2024
185 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

48646 readers
1050 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS