525
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by IndustryStandard@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

From a hotel in Kyoto to a sandwich joint in Edinburgh, the world is becoming hostile toward Israelis who are learning that a vacation won't shield them from the Gaza war.

During the nine months of war the Israeli tourist experience abroad has been marked by fears of antisemitism and efforts to avoid pro-Palestinian demonstrations.

According to reports by Israeli media and posts online, some of those worries have recently turned real for a number of Israeli tourists.Anecdotal incidents at touristic locations around the world are making it clear that even though there is no official policy of excluding Israelis, that is sometimes the situation on the ground.

An especially bumpy week began on June 17 at the Material Hotel in Kyoto, Japan, when an Israeli named Alex was informed that his reservation had been canceled due to the allegations of Israeli war crimes in Gaza. The Material told Alex that it was "not able to accept reservations from persons we believe might have ties to the Israeli army," as reported by Israeli website Ynet.

The story made the rounds on social media, produced a stern protest letter from Israel's ambassador in Tokyo, and led to a rebuke by the Kyoto municipality that the hotel had breached Japanese business law and must ensure that such a transgression won't happen again.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 219 points 4 months ago

Jews around the word are less safe because of Israel when they were promised the opposite. Their faith has been used as a cover for a land grab and they put your holy symbol on a flag they go to war, and worse, under. It's no wonder so many Jews at least in the US are critical of Israel. It probably feels a lot like being a regular Muslim watching groups commit violence with their religious iconography and warped interpretations used to create 'justification'.

[-] Transporter_Room_3@startrek.website 51 points 4 months ago

Anecdotally, I've never met any Jewish people in the US who didn't have strongly negative opinions of the government/state of Israel.

Some people aren't okay with their holy texts being warped into a cudgel and used to beat down the innocent.

[-] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 32 points 4 months ago

It depends on your particular social circle but 80-85% of Jews are supportive of Israel. Most oppose Netanyahu.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] slumlordthanatos@lemmy.world 26 points 4 months ago

Some people aren't okay with their holy texts being warped into a cudgel and used to beat down the innocent.

Damn, if that isn't a spot-on description of how I feel about my faith right now.

My parents don't understand why I stopped going to church, amd when I try to explain why, they say that they're different when they're really not.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago

A lot like being German in 1949.

[-] cygnus@lemmy.ca 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Sounds like you're condoning this behaviour.

Edit: good old Lemmy, where saying it's bad to hate on people just because of where they're born will get you downvoted to oblivion. You all need to step back and re-examine your views.

[-] MyEdgyAlt@sh.itjust.works 63 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

It doesn’t say they’re excluding all Jewish people, it says they’re excluding Israelis. You know, people from the country where they all serve in the military, except the most extreme religious extremists (for now anyway), the country actively violating international law in the West Bank and actively committing genocide.

There are plenty of non-Israeli Jewish people. Non-Zionist Jews are lovely people and should not be excluded.

This is the same as refusing to do business with apartheid South Africans.

[-] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

This is the same as refusing to do business with apartheid South Africans.

Reminds me of some of the tourism sanctions on Russians as well. I don't like when the net's cast too wide, I know for a fact there are Israeli and Russian peoples who would stop these conflicts if they could and it sucks they're caught up in this, but I can understand the premise of barring by nationality. I just also know in the case of Israel, it's likely going to be taken to far or used as a point to embolden bigots who may try to use this to cover their beliefs about all Jews and make them appear easier for normal folk to tolerate. Really a double edge sword because I do think Israel needs a dose of responsibility, hell if the world had the balls American could use one too.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] cygnus@lemmy.ca 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

This is some random dude, not Benjamin Netanyahu. Would you support that hotel banning all Palestinians because they are governed by an internationally-recognized terrorist organisation?

[-] Samvega 20 points 4 months ago

Would you support that hotel banning all Palestinians because they are governed by an internationally-recognized terrorist organisation?

When's the last time Palestinians got to vote for who they are governed by?

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee 16 points 4 months ago

Sounds like this is someone with significant ties to the IDF. Although since they force everyone except religious extremists to serve, maybe that doesn't mean much.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] radivojevic@discuss.online 44 points 4 months ago

Sounds like you didn’t comprehend their comment.

[-] ProvableGecko@lemmy.world 27 points 4 months ago

YES.

Denizens of an apartheid regime, beneficiaries of a genocide do not get to enjoy tourism abroad. Is that unequivocal enough for you?

[-] Steve@communick.news 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Punishing unknown people for the actions of their government?
As a US citizen, this is concerning.

My government has done all kinds of shit I have no control over, and don't condone.
Should I be held responsible for any of it?

[-] Samvega 17 points 4 months ago

Punishing unknown people for the actions of their government?

Yes, I agree, killing innocent people because of the country they are in is terrible.
So terrible that the act of limiting the leisure options of the people who support those actions becomes morally acceptable, because shaming bad behaviour is actually a good thing to do.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] BakerBagel@midwest.social 15 points 4 months ago

Maybe America would stop being such a shit show if other countries actually stoped cowtowing to American demands and forced is to behave properly.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] MyEdgyAlt@sh.itjust.works 12 points 4 months ago

I don’t want to be held responsible for the appalling actions of my government, but as a voter I understand why people in other countries would. I have more control over it than they do, so them influencing me influences my government.

[-] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 12 points 4 months ago

Denial of hospitality is not the same as a punishment. Speak to US soldiers stationed on Okinawa and you’ll hear similar sentiments from the locals towards them

Saying “I don’t want to offer room and board to a IDF soldier who may have been in Gaza” isn’t a big leap for Japanese society, they’ve apologized for and reckoned with their imperialist past and brutal ethnic cleansing, and generally as a nation actively pushed for peace and cooperation globally. Israel hasn’t done the same, and doesn’t work towards the same goal.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] BakerBagel@midwest.social 20 points 4 months ago

Correct. Citizens of a government that is conducting a genocide ahould not be welcome in other countries.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Transporter_Room_3@startrek.website 15 points 4 months ago

Nice awardspeechedit

You aren't being down voted for saying it's bad to hate on people because they're Jewish or Israeli.

You're being down voted for espousing a false dichotomy, on par with "if you aren't with us you're against us"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] CapeWearingAeroplane@sopuli.xyz 84 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

It honestly feels like we somehow have to take back the (very loaded) word "antisemitism", as Israel and its supporters seem intent on making it mean "anything the Israeli government disagrees with".

I'm not an antisemite, and have no hate whatsoever for anyone because of theirs religious beliefs or where they come from. My views are antizionist and antigenocide. Which are strictly political views, not tied to any specific demographic of people.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 24 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

This has been going on for years though. In the same way that it is not islamophobic to criticize somebody who happens to be Muslim. It is not anti-semitic to criticize somebody who is Jewish. But you try explaining that to Jewish person and you get pushback as if somehow criticizing the military and their government, is the same as criticizing them even though I never even mentioned them.

According to my parents this argument has been going on since the '60s so I don't think it's going to get resolved anytime soon.

load more comments (24 replies)
[-] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 74 points 4 months ago

Cut it out with this antisemitism bullshit. Nobody cares that you're Jewish. People care about genocide no matter what invisible sky being you prefer.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] ImADifferentBird 58 points 4 months ago

Sounds a lot like what Americans faced when Bush attacked Iraq. And just as justified (ie not unjustified, but perhaps taken to extremes).

Israelis: Your government has made your nation a pariah. You are the people best positioned to change that. Get those motherfuckers out of office.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago

Whoever said history repeats itself was spot on

[-] MehBlah@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Truth is that many don't care that they get called anti semitic because one small subset of a religion over applies the term entirely out of context. They made it a meaningless slur on anyone who is against genocide.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The Israeli government sucks, but it's not fair to punish its traveling citizens for that.

[-] Deceptichum@quokk.au 33 points 4 months ago

Yes it is.

The Israel government does not exist in a vacuum. Its Israelis running the government, Israelis committing war crimes, and its Israelis who should be held accountable for their actions.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 24 points 4 months ago

"The American government does not exist in a vacuum. It's Americans running the government, Americans committing war crimes, and it's Americans who should be held responsible for their actions."

[-] ProvableGecko@lemmy.world 36 points 4 months ago
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Yen@feddit.uk 23 points 4 months ago

You are not making the point you think you are.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Letstakealook@lemm.ee 14 points 4 months ago

They all serve in the IDF. They have all been actively involved in war crimes. There are no innocent Israeli adults.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 13 points 4 months ago

https://www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/unbound/bookauth/zionism/america.htm

It is an atlantic article but it's from the 90s and an excerpt from a book. America was already Zion, but Jews integrated too much for the hyperconservatives.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2024
525 points (100.0% liked)

News

23361 readers
2867 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS