I probably agree with this, but I have no idea what it's trying to say.
The caterpillar is non-renewable energies. It's doing good and growing, but it can't keep on eating and shitting forever because poop will accumulate and resources will run out.
The caterpillar needs to transform to a butterfly (renewable energy) to keep on living.
Except that butterflies don't actually eat anything and die after a couple of weeks.
Except that butterflies don’t actually eat anything
[citation needed]
die after a couple of weeks.
Really depends on the species.
But the caterpillar poop is fertilizer for new plants who'll grow up better, so in this case it would be renewable energy?
It says it's explaining economics, though, not climate change.
"cringe intensifies"
That's the most carrot shaped caterpillar I've ever seen lol
Discussions about degrowth and all sorts of related topics. This includes UBI, economic democracy, the economics of green technologies, enviromental legislation and many more intressting economic topics.
