891
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] julianschmulian 6 points 4 months ago

clearly they have never heard of harry g frankfurts (excellent) „on bullshit“

[-] GrabtharsHammer@lemmy.world 87 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The paper explicitly states that they are calling ChatGPT "bullshit" in the Frankfurtian sense and they cite "On Bullshit" as the source for that definition. It's right there in the introduction.

You'd know this if you had read the paper or even checked whether your statement were true. So either you read it and then lied deliberately, or you didn't read the paper nor actually care about the truth value of your own statement, rendering your comment itself bullshit in the Frankfurtian sense.

[-] julianschmulian 5 points 4 months ago

jesus christ ofc i didn‘t read the paper, i was just making a joke ffs

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2024
891 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

11130 readers
2723 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS