938

But of course we all know that the big manufacturers don't do this not because they can't but because they don't want to. Planned obsolescence is still very much the name of the game, despite all the bullshit they spout about sustainability.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago

Meh.

Overpriced.

I can buy 3 or 4 pairs of BT5 earphones for the price of these.

My most expensive pair currently was $75.

I've never had batteries go bad in them - they get broken well before that happens. Though I have a noise canceling headset from 2006 that still works. Battery lasts long enough.

I'd rather break a pair of $30 earphones, and have multiple spares than a single pair of $150.

And they all sound about the same given the source and environment.

[-] noodlejetski@lemm.ee 74 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Overpriced.

their entire premise is making sure that people on the supply chain of their devices are compensated adequately (hence the "Fair" in the name), which is why their products are more expensive than you're used to.

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 36 points 2 years ago

Nooooo! You can pry my cheap tat produced by child labour from my cold dead hands!

[-] UckyBon@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

It's called feel-good marketing. Similar to organic veggies or ethical coffee from Starbucks.

[-] noodlejetski@lemm.ee 11 points 2 years ago

I don't know about Starbucks or Big Organic Veggie, but Fairphone publishes annual reports on sustainability and life quality of their workers.

[-] UckyBon@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Of course, that's part of the marketing idea. Starbucks (and many others with feel-good marketing) did the exact same, until it leaks that it wasn't quite the truth.

It's not for nothing that Fairphone is guilt-tripping in rich countries ;) But still exploiting poor countries.

And downvote me what you want. It doesn't make you immune for cheap marketing tricks. People with a Fairphone are the same kind of people who brag about how their cup of Starbucks saved a life, stepped right into the trickery.

[-] Dariusmiles2123@sh.itjust.works 33 points 2 years ago

While I’m not blaming you, what you’re saying is really the problem in our society.

[-] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago

I blame his mother. There, I said it.

[-] tabular@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

But their mother's mother is to blame for their mother!

[-] colmear@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 2 years ago

I totally get it, why buy one expensive thing once, when you can buy cheap stuff that will cost more in the long run? 5 times 30 surely is cheaper than 1 times 150.

From my experience, there is just stuff where you don’t want to cheap out on. Don’t get me wrong, there is no need to buy „premium“ stuff when good stuff is about the same quality but cheaper, but buying cheap stuff, just because it is a little less than the good stuff usually never pays off for me

[-] BallsandBayonets@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

Sadly in my experience the boots theory is no longer accurate as the $50 pair of boots fall apart as quickly as the $10 pair, especially when talking about electronics. There may be longer lasting devices out there but the price is so beyond my price range that it may as well not exist.

Updated for 2024, the boots theory would read something more like a $50 pair of boots lasts for one year and is mostly comfortable to wear, the $10 pair lasts for one year but is uncomfortable to wear, and the $2000 pair of boots is comfortable and will last many years but anyone who buys them will toss them after one year anyway when "the fashion" changes.

[-] iopq@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

My batteries are already on their last legs in the Sony tws, but I'll be replacing them with new ones.

If your $30 earphones break before their batteries do, maybe consider buying something that does not break in a year of use?

[-] dukethorion@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

When I shopped for wireless earbuds, I spent a half hour comparing the top brands (most expensive), so I ended up asking the clerk what he used (saw one in his ear). The ones he recommended were $20 and they're great, sound decent, and last all day.

Sometimes cheap is just as good.

[-] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

In my experience 30 bucks is a terrible price range for in-ears or headphones, mostly Chinese garbage that fails after a few months, maybe a year or two tops, even with just light usage. My current ones were at around 100 bucks and already outlived my previous cheap ones by quite a bit. That being said, FairPhone is kinda well known for being overpriced in regards to cost vs quality too, at least with their phones.

this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2024
938 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

76523 readers
1294 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS