789
submitted 2 years ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

The U.S. will mark the anniversary of the January 6 insurrection on Saturday, a milestone that will confer upon the reality-dwelling citizenry a grim reminder of the potency of propaganda and how quickly it can warp perception when introduced into the public square.

Just three years ago, most of the country watched with dismay and horror as a violent MAGA mob beat back authorities and stormed the country’s citadel of democracy. The Donald Trump-incited crush of disillusioned rioters, fueled by a stream of fantastical lies, believed that the 2020 election had been stolen by sinister forces working to undermine the democratic election.

Of course, not only was their belief flatly incorrect, but evidence later emerged indicating that it was Trump who, in fact, had tried to subvert democracy.

Facts, however, have little bearing on the sentiment inside the Republican Party, which has been fed a steady diet of lies and half-truths by Fox News and the rest of the sprawling right-wing media machine. To wit, the false notion that Joe Biden nefariously stole the 2020 election is now widely shared inside the GOP. A CNN poll conducted over the summer found that nearly 70% of Republicans believe Biden’s win was not legitimate, a number that has continued to tick up.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Diva@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Just 3 years after the January 6 attack, the "harm reduction" candidate is aiding (rushing weapons to, no less) an active genocide, using multiple aircraft carrier groups to fend off the second-poorest country in the middle east, because they are attempting ( and succeeding at) a blockade on the genociders, demanding a ceasefire.

Yeah I'd say there's a lot of propaganda about January 6 if that's where your attention is.

[-] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 years ago

Today on, actual leftist, or right wing Poe's law troll: will voting for Trump end Israeli occupation of Gaza? Call 1800-OBV-IOUS to share your thoughts

[-] Diva@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I'm not voting for Trump, I'm writing in Hamas. Honestly incredible that democrats feel like they're entitled to my vote.

[-] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 years ago

You are writing in an organization which openly calls for the extermination of Jewish people?

[-] Diva@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The end to the Jewish settler-ethnostate. They can participate in representative democracy with the rest of the Palestinians. Or are you trying to imply that anti-zionism is antisemitism?

You're literally trying to guilt trip me into voting for the person supporting an actual genocide

[-] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 years ago

Secular representative democracy, right?

[-] Diva@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Would be an improvement over the settler ethnostates apartheid government.

[-] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Ah perfect, because that was the status quo of the Palestine Mandate - to govern Palestine via a bicameral legislature comprised of separate Muslim and Jewish houses. And I assume you know which side accepted this proposal and which side violently rejected it?

[-] Diva@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

Yeah, because they were rejecting the settler-colony. How about zero settler states and 1 state for everyone that isn't an ethnostate?

[-] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago

This was pre-Israel. Partition was only considered because Arab Palestinians refused secular democracy. But as a student of history, you knew.that already.

[-] Diva@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

Not sure what you're trying to accomplish here, is your position that ethnostates are good, or that US taxpayers are not complicit in genocide?

[-] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

My point is that you claim to want secular democracy, and then you hold a double standard when it comes to Palestinian Arabs explicitly rejecting your solution. If you can convince Hamas to agree to secular unification then they will give you the Nobel Peace prize every day for the next 100 years. But this is not some big brain moment. Democratic unification has been tried. Democratic partition has been tried.

[-] Diva@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

Sounds like you've talked yourself into supporting genocide. I support the people fighting to end the genocide with any means at their disposal.

[-] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

You mean the side which chooses mass rape over secular democracy? You express support for secular democracy, so I can only infer your feelings on mass rape based on that.

[-] Diva@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

lmao 'mass rapes' you sound like some newsmax grandpa

[-] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago

Like you, I agree that secular unification is the obvious solution to this conflict. However, I am unwilling to ignore the role that religious extremism has historically played in preventing that outcome. It actually saddens me to once again see leftists abandon their first principles in favor of brain dead revolutionary fan service.

Israel is absolutely an apartheid state which has brutalized Gaza far beyond what is necessary for security, retribution or deterrence. They should be condemned and sanctioned soundly for this. However, if you espouse support for secular unification, then you must also acknowledge that the Islamic opposition to Jewish co-governance is a major force preventing this outcome, and it has been that way since before the state of Israel has existed.

[-] Diva@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

At this point I don't care about your concern trolling, excuses and hypotheticals when there's actual shit going down now. The US should really stop supporting Israel if they want any credibility in the rest of the world going forward.

[-] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

"Excuses and Hypotheticals" being history of the conflict you didn't know about until now?

You are the one who proposed hypothetical unification.

[-] Diva@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

Your position is that when the apartheid government ends, the barbaric savages who have been getting kept at bay by the glorious liberal "democracy" it has (for the right types of citizens who qualify) will take revenge in a way just as brutal and exterminationist as the zionist colony.

That's just chauvinism, and you're just repeating discredited hasbara and acting like a scholar which is fucking hilarious.

we have a real-world example of what happens when an apartheid government ends- was there a genocide of white people in south africa?

[-] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago

I am not making any statement which is not the formal position of Hamas. But you didn't state that you would write in the Palestinian Authority.

[-] Diva@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

lol liberals rolling up to tone police left opposition when your literal position is "lets give the genocidal ethnostate unlimited weapons because it's full of hot white girls who're going to get mass raped by the brown hordes if we just stand by" + "don't forget to vote"

You have the same position when it comes to this as some of the most disgusting republicans I've known

[-] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago

You express preference for secular unification, a stance I have agreed with. I have not expressed any desire to arm Israel. That is all in your head.

[-] Diva@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

good, do you feel upset that the biden government is rushing weapons there? You called me a right wing troll for not wanting to vote for genocide Joe (because of exactly this). Explain your logic.

[-] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago

If it is not incredibly obvious that Trump would do far worse than token support of Israel, then you are either not paying attention to the things he says and does, or you seek to intentionally downplay the things he says and does.

He would, first of all, continue to arm Israel. He would also move onto University campuses with feds to arrest people protesting the war. And he would use this as a premise to escalate tensions with Iran. He has stated all of these things many times. Passive support for Trump objectively and unambiguously accomplishes none of the things you profess to value.

If you want to repeat the mistakes of 2016 in letting the perfect be the enemy of the good, then I assume you either so privileged that you don't believe you will be affected by American fascism, or you are a troll. However, I apologize if you are just naive.

[-] Diva@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

"passive support for trump" lmao

If you seriously think that the democrats are capable of standing between where we are now and fascism, one that's pretty naive too. I am telling you that we're already there- we're supporting the ethnostate ethnically cleansing. You're arguing that it could hypothetically be worse, I'm telling you it doesn't fucking matter at this point, I'm disgusted.

[-] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Right, so because of this attitude, people in Texas actually can't use period tracking apps, and people in Ohio are being arrested for having miscarriages. This is not a hypothetical. Doctors in Seattle are being subpoenaed by the Texas AG for providing gender affirming care. This didn't come out of nowhere. We have been yelling about these real, non hypothetical risks constantly. And now, if Trump wins, we know he will use the feds to extradite doctors across state lines. They have openly stated that they will use the executive branch to enforce this Christian nationalism. This is not a hypothetical.

If you are fine with that moral liability, then carry on.

As for me? I am a leftist who actually cares about protecting the vulnerable.

[-] Diva@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Maybe the democrats should stop doing evil shit if they want people to support them. It rules having libs (good cops) roll up to show me all the evil shit their friends (the bad cops) are going to do to us if we don't support them while they unalive every last brown person standing in the way of the settlers.

Also so much of this shit is happening under democrat governments anyways because they're fucking useless at getting anything done or protecting vulnerable people. They're literally cutting a deal on border security to get more weapons to a genocide

[-] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago

Right, it's very clear that you don't take the actual threat of this project 2025 shit seriously, because you are so incredibly privileged that you will allow your ideological purity blind you to the real world. And at the end of the day, you won't actually prevent any brown people from dying, and will likely make the situation far worse.

But that's fine because what you actually want to do is whine, not govern. Because whining is easy.

[-] Diva@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Maybe the Democrats should stop doing unpopular things like giving unlimited unconditional material and military support to a genocide.

Sounds like they're the ones not taking this threat seriously. The only plan seems to be to scold people who are disgusted by your actions.

[-] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Friend, if supporting Trump liberates Gaza I'll sell everything I own and dedicate my life to rebuilding the region with my own frail hands, and I will die happy for being wrong.

If it doesn't, I hope you will dedicate your life to seeking forgiveness at trans funerals for ignoring these alarms.

If we have a deal, perhaps we can agree to disagree and leave it at that.

[-] Diva@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

I'm literally fucking trans, you have some supreme fucking nerve trying to guilt trip me when the primary fucking killer of Palestinian gay and trans people is the ongoing indiscriminate murder from occupation forces.

Democrats are the worst "allies" in human history.

[-] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

And that won't stop if Trump is elected. The only difference will be that you and I will be up against the wall as well.

Also, Hamas definitely does not tolerate any LGBT lifestyles.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] badaboomxx@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Just imagine that the republican agenda will keep the things as they are regardless of whoever is in power.

So yeah the president is wrong in this one, but the gop is wrong in this one and in almost everything they do.

[-] Diva@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Just imagine that the republican agenda will keep the things as they are regardless of whoever is in power.

I don't view the democrats as credible actors for improving things. Joe Biden still owes me $600 ffs.

Everything shitty that got started under Trump, finished under Biden. They're literally cutting a deal with republicans over the border to get weapons to a genocide faster.

[-] badaboomxx@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Lol, just remember who had the majority of the house. Basically you are complaining for something that the republican party has thr majority of power to stop and yet they don't do it. Funny if you ask me.

[-] Diva@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

I don't fucking care about which fucking rightwing party had which percentage of the house, it's not like any of them are actually trying to get anything done besides writing fat checks to weapons manufacturers. If we can have an election and then the opposite of the election happens in policy it sounds like we have a pretty worthless fucking democracy and nothing worth defending.

Biden could simply not arm the apartheid ethnostate which is ethnically cleansing Palestine.

Instead he's sending aircraft carrier groups to prevent Yemen from attempting to apply pressure for a ceasefire by blockading.

[-] badaboomxx@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Sure bud, but the bOtH sIdEs argument is not good at all.

But tell me, under the other parry, would things be different?

[-] Diva@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

Only the rhetoric would be different, the policy outcomes would be the same. I have a lot of negative emotions associated with having a bunch of soulless monsters pretending like they're somehow advancing the cause of LGBT rights by dumping weapons on a genocidal apartheid government.

[-] badaboomxx@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Again the bOtH sIdEs argument is really bad in this case, because you know, I don't see one side removing rights of a sector of the population.

The hypocrisy here is the fact that many conservatives try to pass the blame 100% to the party in power even if the other party boycots them.

[-] Diva@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

The hypocrisy here is the fact that many conservatives try to pass the blame 100% to the party in power even if the other party boycots them.

This sentence makes no sense, please do better.

The democrats are literally helping in the removal of rights of an entire fucking population what the fuck are you talking about.

[-] badaboomxx@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Nah, they don't. The republican party is the one who does that, just look at the abortion rights. You just don't have to lie like that.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] DarthBueller@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Oh the poor Houthi rebels doing Iran’s bidding and attacking international commerce, they’re such victims. Poor guys are going to be red mist soon. Total bummer, said literally no one except shills.

[-] Diva@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

Heroic Yemeni military acting on the Responsibility to Protect, doing whatever is in its power to stop the ongoing genocide. Every country should be doing what Yemen is doing and demand a ceasefire in Gaza.

US global legitimacy is going down the fucking toilet and you have nobody but yourselves to thank for it.

load more comments (2 replies)
this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2024
789 points (100.0% liked)

News

32981 readers
2387 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS