545
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] UnspecificGravity@lemmings.world 22 points 1 year ago

Not very many people have argued that people who have actually made violent threats and been institutionalized should be buying guns.

[-] TechyDad@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

The 5th Circuit Court (with at least one judge appointed by Trump) has ruled that removing the guns from a violent domestic abuser violates his rights: https://www.texastribune.org/2023/02/09/guns-domestic-abuse-second-amendment/

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 27 points 1 year ago

This guy was a firearms instructor. Literally a good guy with a gun turned into a bad guy with a gun.

[-] UnspecificGravity@lemmings.world 25 points 1 year ago

The key point is that he was also recently institutionalized after making threats and SHOULD have had his guns seized, even under existing law.

[-] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Agreed, but we haven't been enforcing red flag laws consistently since people start bitching about "mah rites" whenever you try to disarm someone threatening to kill their ex-GF.

Most of these laws, and most of the historic gun control in the US, is really intended to be used to keep guns from the "wrong sort" of people, and that means leftists and brown people generally. Crazy white guys were never the target of any prior firearms legislation or enforcement mechanism. That's really the core of the problem here.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

What was his ratemyprofessor rating?

[-] Goblin_Mode@ttrpg.network 12 points 1 year ago

Gallows humor really does hit different when your 2 hours into doom scrolling lol

[-] superguy@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago
[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Gallows humor existed long before Reddit came along. It will be here long after Reddit is forgotten.

[-] superguy@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I just meant it was a lame joke befitting of reddit comedians and their fans.

[-] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

True, but continuing to vote for representatives who refuse to have any conversation about gun control still makes them complicit in this behavior.

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

And Republicans will still refuse to do any sort of enforcement law.

[-] Cannacheques@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

Someone once told me, be careful of your thoughts for your thoughts may affect your words, be careful of your words because your words may come to become your actions, be careful of your actions for your actions may reflect on your character.

If you ask me, owning a firearm and making violent threats don't necessarily mean actions, but I agree that there's a definitive correlation. I guess that I still believe that the action itself is the most honest and serious commitment to something a person can express.

I think the fundamental issues with guns is that they SUBSTANTIALLY shorten the time and effort to put thoughts into action. Thinking "man, i want to kill everyone here." is a pretty abstract thought, until you actually have the means to kill everyone there right at hand.

[-] Iapar@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

Jupp. And it's so effortless. Try to pull that shit with a knife.

this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
545 points (100.0% liked)

News

23669 readers
2985 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS