619
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Mudface@lemmy.world 70 points 2 years ago

Canada is going to elect a conservative government, too

[-] ikiru@lemmy.ml 35 points 2 years ago

They don't need to elect anything. Fascism is inherently militaristic.

If the US goes full fascist, then it's only a matter of time.

No place in the world will be safe.

[-] fiat_lux@kbin.social 15 points 2 years ago

Most places in the world were never safe from the US anyway, it has had aggressively competitive foreign policy for the last 80 years.

[-] ikiru@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

No argument there, but it can always get worse.

[-] RupeThereItIs@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Meh, the USA won't invade Canada. Even if we go full fascist Canada is way better as a frenemy.

Our largest trading partner won't be able to give us a reason to invade.

Mexico on the other hand should watch out, given the amount of scapegoating our right wing throw their way.

[-] TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

Mexico is their largest trading partner now, just a heads up.

[-] BURN@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Facts have never had an effect on conservative feelings, despite one of their favorite sayings being “facts don’t care about your feelings”

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yeah but the fascists are already talking about invading them. And like hey, last time we did it we got our most profitable state out of it

[-] RupeThereItIs@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Who's? Canada's or the USA? In both cases that's false.

The Canadian economy is inextricably linked to ours (USA). Any plans they have to deal with a racist USA has to take that, and the military disparity, into account. Canada is in a very shit situation if the USA falls to fascism. Appeasement is their only realistic option.

[-] ikiru@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

Canada is in a very shit situation if the USA falls to fascism. Appeasement is their only realistic option.

Ah, yes, the famous stopper of fascist expansion: Appeasement.

[-] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

Canada has already been identified as a valid target for decades due to South Parks "blame Canada."

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

Our largest trading partner won't be able to give us a reason to invade.

Water and farmable land?

[-] someguy3@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 years ago

Poilievre isn't conservative. He's pretty much far right.

[-] Ertebolle@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

He supports Ukraine, climate change targets, new housing construction, abortion rights, immigration, legal weed, and gay marriage. He has plenty of other extremely problematic positions and I hope he loses badly, but nevertheless, the gap between him and basically any Republican is pretty substantial.

[-] Conowelle@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 years ago

He’s voted against abortion rights, he’s voted against gay marriage, he’s lukewarm about legal weed but tbf prob wont illegalize it, and his solution to climate change is producing more oil.

[-] Ertebolle@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago

Wikipedia:

In 2020, he changed his position and said that a government led by him would never introduce a bill on the topic, and no private ones would be adopted. In 2021, Poilievre opposed a private member bill prohibiting sex-selective abortion.

Poilievre supports same-sex marriage; in a 2020 interview, he called it a "success" and stated "I voted against it 15 years ago. But I learned a lot".

And yeah, he wants to produce more oil, but so does Biden. And for that matter, Trudeau also wants to build more oil pipelines. I wish there were more mainstream politicians who were genuinely anti-fossil-fuel but those are, unfortunately, few and far between.

[-] Conowelle@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago
  1. Wikipedia is not a reliable source
  2. They keep voting to infringe on that right as recently as this year https://amp.theguardian.com/world/2023/aug/03/canada-abortion-rights-pregnancy
  3. Ya I don’t think that Pollievre would restrict access to gay marriage, but if he voted against it with his gay father in attendance, if that isn’t a sign of a piece of shit I don’t know what is. ( he also is courting the voters and MP’s that do want to restrict it)
  4. Then vote for Singh and the NDP as he’s the only Federal Leader that kind of has a chance to become PM, that opposes oil, and at least the Trudeau government is talking about removing oil subsidies.
[-] Electricorchestra@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

Honestly the most daming thing about PP is that he's been in goverance since he finished uni, never held a real job in his life. Also I'm 100% sure he's never made a woman cum.

[-] Powerpoint@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago

Two years still. Lots can change and people will see through the piss poor attempt at the Conservative rebranding of Poilievre.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

People the world over have been remarkably bad at seeing through cheap far-right populist pandering. I don't trust the electorate.

[-] banneryear1868@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

We basically flip between Liberal and Conservative on schedule. Trudeau took a gamble on positive numbers calling the last election early but I think his brand is essentially dead. PP is getting a huge image treatment right now if you've seen his tanned face and new persona, like they're throwing full weight in to making him relatable, and you can tell what a massive effort that is lol. I don't see too much of a material difference between LPC and CPC though, CPC is more shameless but the things LPC does to sovereign nations inside our country should be setting off more alarm bells than they are. People forget those treaties are with the Crown not the Canadian government. Also fuck the Liberals for not changing the vote, they campaigned so hard on that and I can't believe I fell for it first time around. NDP are polling decently well too but with the voting being what it is they're screwed. Although I'm not a huge fan of Jagmeet and how he became leader and think NDP need to do better with their branding and messaging, right now it's like "we're liberals but more authentic" but they need to be more forthcoming with the economic vision and why it will benefit everyone regardless of their identity. A straight white tradesman needs to get the message that he has just as much interest in voting NDP as a nonconforming individual, and I think they really need to tie these messages back to the economic benefit and power of having solidarity with others in achieving material political goals.

[-] Mudface@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Great summary, and good insight imo

A lot of NDP voters where I am at, but PP is going to get my vote. Cost of living is my #1 voting issue and Pierre is the only one I’ve even heard talking about it.

NDP and Liberals just don’t care about how much money I have left in my pockets at the end of the month, they think it’s all theirs anyways

[-] banneryear1868@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

On housing PP wants to "remove beurocracy" for developers which means they can build what will maximize their profits with less regard for regulations, and with the huge demand for housing this allows them to cater to mid-upper range of home buyers and cut corners. Milton and north Oakille are good case studies for this strategy where it's basically all dual-income managerial workers and white collar professionals living in blocked out subdivisions with cheaply made "luxury" homes.

Liberals just pulled their move today by waiving GST for rental unit developers but as usual it's a pandering half-measure.

NDP share the tax GHT/HST waiving for renters in their housing policy on top of using under-utilized federal land to build social and co-op housing right away, as well as forcing developers to build affordable housing with the communities and municipalities having more say. They also want to extend CMHC insured mortgages for first-time buyers to 30 years so people's monthly payments would be less. Although I think the down payment is the hurdle for most.

[-] Auli@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago

I'll tell you a secret nothing he does well influence it. Sure cost might godown but won't be because of any one running the country. If the president doesn't matter for the Is economy I would assume it's the same for us.

[-] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

Short memory huh? Why do you think we are in such a mess in the first place?

https://www.ctvnews.ca/mobile/canada-s-banks-received-114b-bailout-study-asserts-1.803031

We're the only western country that didn't see a dip in housing in 2008/2009.

this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2023
619 points (100.0% liked)

politics

25032 readers
2186 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS