101
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

He also blames "welfare queens." And calls them fat.

[-] MasterObee@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

He says we have a bunch of people starving, and we have programs to help, but instead of helping, he sees the programs being abused.

Do you not think these programs are being abused? Have you been to the south where poverty and obesity are at insane rates?

Also, it's hilarious how he can touch on 20 issues that every one of us agree with, but the left hyper-focuses on one line they don't like, because he just looks like a hillbilly trump supporter to y'all.

[-] Rilichu@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"Also, it's hilarious how he can touch on 20 issues that every one of us agree with, but the left hyper-focuses on one line they don't like, because he just looks like a hillbilly trump supporter to y'all."

That's sorta the problem of right wing populism dude. Yeah, many of the issues pointed out in the song are legitimate and need to be addressed but how he tacks on "welfare queens" is trying to shift the blame onto people have nothing to do with your own hardships. That family getting $400 a month in food stamps is not the reason everything sucks right now.

[-] MasterObee@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

“welfare queens”

Where are you quoting this from? You aren't quoting it from the song, because he didn't say it. It's you quoting some left wing talking point.

Look at the lines, he says there are people dying of starvation, because the welfare we're supposed to receive is being misallocated. Have you ever been to the rural south?

That family getting $400 a month in food stamps is not the reason everything sucks right now.

Yeah, we all know that. And he didn't blame them.

[-] Rilichu@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

"Lord, we got folks in the street, ain't got nothin' to eat And the obese milkin' welfare"

Misremembered the line but regardless, still sure sounds like he's blaming them.

[-] MasterObee@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

The song title is 'Rich men north of Richland' - it's about how the politicians are fucking up America - both inner city and rural America.

That is the underlying theme for the song, so him saying people are starving while there are some milking the system doesn't make sense. Increase welfare, or fix it, help those that need it.

Trust me, I really really wish he didn't have that line, because he talks about so many bigger issues that the left agrees with, but now they can just discredit this redneck hillbilly as being an alt right industry plant. But i feel even if that line wasn't in the song, that y'all would bitch about him calling out epstein and just say he's a Qanon freak.

[-] Signtist@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago

I listened to his song before I knew anything about him, and I was into it until that point, but yeah, when you make a song about rich people exploiting you, but then spend half the song talking about the much less impactful issue of poor people wasting their government-issued money on junk food, your message stops being effective.

It's like stubbing your toe and breaking your arm at the same time, and complaining just as much about both.

[-] MasterObee@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

but then spend half the song

Once again, hyperfocusing on one line is not 'half the song' and when you put it in context, he's simply saying that those people that need welfare aren't getting it, while others are abusing the system. It's not just about making laws to help poor people, it's about ensuring that it gets to the people that need it.

[-] btaf45@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

He is redirecting anger that rightfully should be aimed at the overclass to the underclass. The underclass is not causing his problems. It is the overclass.

[-] starrox@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Education folks... education. Prime example here why it is so, so important to be able to think critically.

[-] TaterTurnipTulip@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Have you taken the time to look into why there's such an obesity problem? It sure seems like the singer hasn't, otherwise he wouldn't be denigrating poor people for being obese.

EBT doesn't pay much and the cheaper foods are chock full of terrible ingredients that tend to lead to obesity. It's not easy to afford good fruit, vegetables, grains, etc when you've got a small amount of money that has to stretch a lot.

If it weren't for the myth of the welfare queen we might be in a better place to provide for people in need. And there will ALWAYS be people in need in a capitalist society. It's how it works.

Honestly, a bit of empathy and understanding would go a long ways for people so upset about people on welfare.

[-] scottywh@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I can't even see you but I can tell you look like a "hillbilly trump supporter" too.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

I like fudge rounds. And I’m not fat or on welfare. Checkmate ginger. Lol

this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
101 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19148 readers
1792 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS