35
Is "AI slop" enough?
(lemmy.eco.br)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 23 May 2026
35 points (100.0% liked)
Asklemmy
54385 readers
961 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
I feel like this is another example of a topic title with a different question than the body.
I interpreted the title ask asking something like whether "AI slop" is good enough. Or asking if "AI slop" is where the technology peaks. (As in, is AI slop enough, or can we do more with AI models?)
I feel like it's yet another a thinly-veiled rant disguised as a question. Which is not to say I disagree with their premise, but there has to be a better community for this soapbox stuff.
I think AI is still in its infancy and we have yet to know it's full potential. Nevertheless, I have a love-hate relationship with AI.