14
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 13 May 2026
14 points (100.0% liked)
Australian Politics
1813 readers
1 users here now
A place to discuss Australia Politics.
Rules
This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone.
Recommended and Related Communities
Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:
- Australia (general)
- Australian News
- World News (from an Australian Perspective)
- Aussie Environment
- Ask an Australian
- AusFinance
- Pictures
- AusLegal
- Aussie Frugal Living
- Cars (Australia)
- Coffee
- Chat
- Aussie Zone Meta
- bapcsalesaustralia
- Food Australia
Plus other communities for sport and major cities.
https://aussie.zone/communities
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Except the federal government has spent the last 50 years telling people to buy real estate. Two thirds of Australians own or have mortgages on their homes. Frankly, anything to rock the boat is going to need to walk the line of what the electorate will accept. You can't just dictate all your wishes to them, the changes will just get repealed and we will be back to square-one.
Times have changed; most of that property is held by a small percentage.
Not all of which are investment properties and they aren’t in this discussion, so that’s redundant. Two thirds don’t have eye pees, which these tax concessions target.
Yeah this again. We know. Weak policy dressed as mature, steady and pragmatic. We hear it all the time after Labor steal something from the Greens (and it is, the Greens wanted these gone before Shorten) and weaken it for interest groups, who are now no longer the majority.
Release tepid policy and not expect those politicians that actually do work for us do something about it. I’ll vote them in to do it again too.
Not if they work, which stopping all going forward and phasing out the rest will do and quickly.