547
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Korne127@lemmy.world 233 points 2 days ago
[-] BassTurd@lemmy.world 48 points 2 days ago

Does jellyfin have an easy way for remote streaming? I have a couple dozen people on my Plex server, most not very tech savvy, so setting up tailscale and running remote that way isn't an option. I have a Plex pass so I haven't been screwed by Plex yet, so I'm not rushing to get out, but I could see myself running both.

[-] roofuskit@lemmy.world 42 points 2 days ago

Yes-ish, it's harder for you than the users. But you will have to secure a URL and they will have to remember that URL. Also there's some security issues with some unsecured endpoints on Jellyfin. That said I have mine out there exposed to the net and am comfortable enough with it.

[-] kratoz29@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

I already have to expose my Plex Media Server with a Tailscsle funnel (for IPv4 only) for IPv6 I use my Synology NAS reverse proxy which can be accessed globally.

I have been maining this setup for years now that I forgot if I can access my PMS outside without either those solutions lol (I am GGNATED but IPv6 works fine as stated).

The main thing here is that I don't need my users to do anything, they just open the app and access it, no need to remember IPs/URLs or install VPNs to my server... Is that possible with Jellyfin as well?

[-] Xanvial@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

Yes you can do the same thing for Jellyfin. I use Synology ddns and setup subdomain in reverse proxy to jellyfin port. For tailscale, I previously use this but needs to add the jellyfin port after the tailscale IP.

[-] roofuskit@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago

No, there's not centralized host server to connect your users with your server. They need a fixed IP or URL to access your server from outside your network.

[-] kratoz29@lemmy.zip 1 points 14 hours ago

So how do they access from, let's say a Smart TV/Android TV device?

[-] Scrollone@feddit.it 2 points 11 hours ago

Jellyfin apps ask you for three things in order to login: URL, username, password.

[-] Gonzako@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I have mine behind a caddy reverse proxy that forces https. I think that handles most sniffing concerns

[-] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

no, tailscale is still the easiest option.

[-] BassTurd@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

Bummer... unfortunately, that's a deal breaker for me to completely drop Plex. Maybe someday.

[-] jj4211@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

So I don't get it, I have mine up with a domain without tsilscale.. The clients are quite happy wherever. I don't even see that much "crawling" traffic that goes to the domain, most just hit the server by ip and get a static 401 page that the "default" site is hard coded to give out.

[-] astro@leminal.space 2 points 13 hours ago

At some point, somewhere on the internet, someone authoritatively claimed that tailscale is the one and only acceptable solution to getting your jellyfin server outside your LAN and it just kind of took root. nginx has worked perfectly fine for me.

[-] priapus@piefed.social 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You could just get a domain and set up a reverse proxy. Or use Cloudflare tunnels.

[-] BassTurd@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

All possible, but currently I have lifetime Plex pass and just need to share with people I want to share with. No extra config. Once Jellyfin can do that or something similar, I'll look at jumping ship. Until then, the juice isn't worth the squeeze.

[-] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Once Jellyfin can do that or something similar

Once Jellyfin does that then it'll be time to look at jumping ship to something else, because that'll be the indication that Jellyfin is going down the same road as Plex.

[-] priapus@piefed.social 14 points 1 day ago

Fair enough. I doubt Jellyfin will ever offer something like that. Its designed to be completely self hosted and not rely on a central server, which I dont see changing.

[-] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

The first one, yes. That's what I do. But IIRC hosting media via cloudflare tunnels goes against the TOC and they reserve the right to ban users over it

[-] madnerds@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 hours ago

They changed their TOC a while ago, the only thing they have in there now is boiler plate stuff about not hosting pirated content.

https://www.cloudflare.com/en-gb/terms/ You agree not to, and not to allow third parties to use the Services to ... post, transmit, store or link to any files, materials, data, text, audio, video, images or other content that infringe on any person’s intellectual property rights or that are otherwise unlawful;

I just set up a cache rule to ignore my jellyfin subdomain and they won't ever care about me and my half dozen users.

[-] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I set mine up with HAProxy for TLS offloading and ACME for the server cert. Restrict your access to just your country/region by GeoIP and you are pretty good to go.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] kratoz29@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

Just to think of replacing the mount points in the docker container from Plex to Jellyfin (in order for it to read my Riven and Decypharr symlinks) scares me... Mostly because after I finish a docker project my mind seems to go blank lol.

At least they still kinda honour the Plex Pass lifetime users...

[-] aeternum 1 points 9 hours ago

At least they still kinda honour the Plex Pass lifetime users…

for now.

[-] stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 days ago

I'd love Jellyfin if not for their incredibly infuriating seek behaviour. Why do I have to press play to start the video again?

[-] Codilingus@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago

In case this helps, for me when I use it on Android TV with said TV's remote, the arrow buttons on the direction pad for anything require pressing play/OK button after. But if I use the fast forward buttons, it does seek and then just keeps playing.

[-] binarytobis@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

For me I just want a fast forward button. They have something they call fast forward, but it seeks instead.

[-] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 12 points 2 days ago

Except the sync / group watch feature is pretty broken which makes me sad

[-] ITGuyLevi@programming.dev 10 points 2 days ago

Agreed! I stayed with Plex for a long time because Jellyfin had a rough time with live TV (antenna) and I already had a PlexPass because of a sale a long time ago. Now Plex is only still running because I love Plexamp.

[-] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 days ago

Dude, yeah. Plexamp had me keeping my server up far longer than I should have.

I struggled to find a decent plexamp replacement and ended up using symphonium, if you're looking for any suggestions. Its been working out pretty well with jellyfin.

For the love, as a Plex alternative, they don’t even have a native app on all major tv stores. It should be a P1 feature. I would throw money at them if they get Apple TV support. Right now, there are no functional apps running on the latest Apple TV OS.

[-] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

For the love, as a Plex alternative, they don’t even have a native app on all major tv stores. It should be a P1 feature.

Are you really bitching this hard about a completely free and open source project?

It's not technology or finances that kill most FOSS projects and burn out the devs. It's this kind of shitty entitled unappreciative demanding attitude from users.

As others have pointed out, there are fully functional and good quality frontends available, such as Swiftfin.

I maintain open source projects too, and I fully understand the burnout, the pressure from supporters and such. What I was saying is they can do better from a project management perspective. Otherwise I love their work :3

Swiftfin is buggy atm, like my other comment.

[-] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

I maintain open source projects too, and I fully understand the burnout, the pressure from supporters and such.

Then you should know better than most that your wording and approach matters.

I haven't used apple tv in a few years, but like, swiftfin worked just fine for me??

[-] mbirth@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

I believe Infuse has Jellyfin support on Apple TV. But they want like £100 for a lifetime license or £2 a month / £13 a year.

Yeaaaaaaaah, I mean it’s a good app, but I don’t know if it justifies a $100 license.

[-] Foni@chachara.club 7 points 2 days ago

The way you switch between two servers you own is more than inconvenient; it's what keeps Plex in my life.I wish things would change because everything else is better.

[-] MangoPenguin 6 points 2 days ago

Thats how I describe Jellyfin, it works fine, its just inconvenient to use.

load more comments (1 replies)
this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2025
547 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

77502 readers
2425 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS