20
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2025
20 points (100.0% liked)
Ask Lemmy
35847 readers
748 users here now
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Does that still work? Last I tried it, YT broke it.
I update it once a month with the inbuild -U switch
Well, fuck. Just at this exact second you've taught me that I've been doing that the hard way for ages, by actually going to the project's github page.
Anyway, another shout out for yt-dlp regardless. I get a giggle every time I see one of those sporadic news articles involving the music recording industry still whinging about piracy. Er, the record labels themselves pathologically post every single track ever recorded to Youtube to rake in that ad revenue, and it's all free for the taking. If you decide you'd like to be proud owner of any of them forever you can just hit it with the ol'
yt-dlp -x.I am continually amazed at the number of non-Youtube sources that yt-dlp Just Works with as well. It seems any video content posted online that you'd like to gaff can be handily vacuumed up with it, regardless of the site operator's desperate attempts to prevent you from doing so.
How did I not know about the -x param? I've been doing --list-formats and then choosing the high quality audio only. This will save me a step. Thank you.
Same way I didn't know about the -U update parameter, I'll bet you. You ask yt-dlp to list its flags and arguments and it spits out a listing into your console that's about nineteen miles long because apparently it can do anything.
The only command line tool I use regularly that's comparably capable and even more byzantine is ImageMagick.