101
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Nighed@feddit.uk 1 points 3 days ago

Why can't Firefox be effected by this?

Does chrome not ask about plugins requesting new permissions or something?

[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 days ago

Because ShadyPanda published a malicious extension for Edge and Chrome.

Not for Firefox based browsers.

... You... can't install an Edge or Chrome extension in a Firefox based browser.

You have to make a different version, designed for Firefox, sorta like a port of a video game; a DreamCast won't play a PlayStation disc, an N64 won't run a GameBoy cartridge.

[-] Nighed@feddit.uk 1 points 3 days ago

It's not that it can't be done then, most likely no one has checked.

Buying out solo deved apps to host malware has been a thing for ages.

[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago

Yep, you could theoretically do a similar sleeper malware as extension for Firefox based browsers.

But that is not what this article is about.

No where in this article is anything about a Firefox based browser mentioned.

So, again, go back your original comment on my comment.

You tried to put a bunch of words in my mouth, now you're trying to argue hypotheticals based on conjecture.

Are you trying to make some kind of point?

Or just waste the time of anyone bothering to read this?

[-] Nighed@feddit.uk 1 points 3 days ago

My point was basically that this can happen to you too, and if it couldn't, people would complain anyway.

No need to call people morons over it.

this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2025
101 points (100.0% liked)

cybersecurity

5227 readers
4 users here now

An umbrella community for all things cybersecurity / infosec. News, research, questions, are all welcome!

Community Rules

Enjoy!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS