29
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2025
29 points (100.0% liked)
Conservative
444 readers
129 users here now
We are a community dedicated to discussion surrounding the political right.
People of all political views are welcome here, but we expect a high level of discussion from everyone.
Rules:
-Good Faith participation only.
-Stay on topic.
-Follow instance rules.
-Only post news articles with the original headlines.
-Please interact with this community if you want to downvote.
-Absolutely no homophobia, transphobia or misgendering anyone.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
There's no such thing as a non-invasive test.
Even if there were zero risks for the actual procedure, and they're just doing it for the fuck of it, what happens if they find a little abnormality? Now you need a biopsy, more scans, and possibly treatment for something that doesn't show any symptoms and never would have.
Words have meanings: non-invasive test
Follow-up tests may be invasive. That’s not relevant to the definition of “non-invasive test”.
Being scared of the possibility of finding something also is not relevant to the definition.