29
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2025
29 points (100.0% liked)
Conservative
444 readers
135 users here now
We are a community dedicated to discussion surrounding the political right.
People of all political views are welcome here, but we expect a high level of discussion from everyone.
Rules:
-Good Faith participation only.
-Stay on topic.
-Follow instance rules.
-Only post news articles with the original headlines.
-Please interact with this community if you want to downvote.
-Absolutely no homophobia, transphobia or misgendering anyone.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Why would you consent to having an MRI if you had no idea what it was for?
You have no idea what they scanned, but know that the results were good?
When the doctor gave you the results, were you not interested in what he was checking for?
Doubt.
Doctor orders a noninvasive test, I take it. From that perspective, I understand it. But the man just doesn’t care to know … anything. His brain is just a steady stream of fake tits and tumbleweeds.
I would also remember why they ordered the scan, because I do care about that aspect of it. I’m not a doctor, but I do know there’s a difference between cancer and a slipped disc.
There's no such thing as a non-invasive test.
Even if there were zero risks for the actual procedure, and they're just doing it for the fuck of it, what happens if they find a little abnormality? Now you need a biopsy, more scans, and possibly treatment for something that doesn't show any symptoms and never would have.
Words have meanings: non-invasive test
Follow-up tests may be invasive. That’s not relevant to the definition of “non-invasive test”.
Being scared of the possibility of finding something also is not relevant to the definition.