622
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SorryQuick@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

There is no gray area.

Let’s take a more extreme situation then. I have chickens. They are free to roam around the yard and do whatever they want. Eventually, when they reach the end of their lives, I kill and eat them. Suffering wise, it’s the exact same as if I hadn’t killed them, they just lose a few of their last days. Honestly it might just save them suffering, considering how most of those last days are spent in pain. Do you still think this is somehow still immoral, despite no additional suffering having been added?

If so, then I guess you’re also one of those people who think humans should live as old as they can, despite their suffering?

[-] the_q@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

Why is eating the poor bird still your argument? Euthenasia is merciful, but you don't get to decide when and you don't do the killing yourself. And why even bring up their suffering when most chickens live arguably the most suffer-filled existence of all factory farmed animals? You don't care about their suffering even in this hypothetical scenario.

[-] SorryQuick@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

What’s your argument agaisnt it though? This is a hypothetical scenario, what I care about or not doesn’t matter. Is it that somehow it’s the act of choosing when they die that’s immoral?

Forget about their suffering existense, in this scenario they have a better life than in nature since they don’t have to worry about predation while still being able to roam about.

this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2025
622 points (100.0% liked)

I Didn’t Have Eggs

746 readers
67 users here now

People making changes to recipes and then complaining it didn’t turn out.

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS