Thanks for sharing the alternative link.

I'm glad for the following quote:

Pellen: If there’s any space for interpretation, then I would never want to step in and ruin that by saying ‘Correct, correct, wrong, wrong, wrong.’ Which isn’t the way we think about anything that has ambiguity in the game anyway. If it exists in the work, it exists in the work. If it doesn’t, it doesn’t. We can’t cheat, add stuff after the fact, or make decisions about that type of thing.

So overthinking is directly encouraged, nice =D