189
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2025
189 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
40415 readers
76 users here now
This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.
Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.
Rules:
1: All Lemmy rules apply
2: Do not post low effort posts
3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff
4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.
5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)
6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist
7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
I get where he's coming from as a tech person... I'm old enough to remember chatting to ELIZA and Alicebot. The current state of AI is impressive to me, as well as "worrying" and "destroying the planet" and "being rammed down our throats" and all the other bad stuff.
It's wildly tone deaf of him to say it in the middle of a backlash, though. 😬
Yea, but he's (intentionally?) misrepresenting things.. people are not "unimpressed" by AI, what they are is not interested in MS "agentic OS", these are not the same things.
It's irresponsible to hand in control of your machine to an AI integrated that deeply into the OS, particularly when it's designed to be tethered to the network and it's privately owned and managed by human entrepreneurs that do have the company's interests as first and main priority.
@Ferk @meejle
> … people are not unimpressed by AI
I disagree strongly. Smart people who understand how it works, and the cost, are DEEPLY and profoundly unimpressed by it.
I want to see it banned.
It's meant in the sense of "underwhelming" (as shown by the follow-up comment the article references). It's not incompatible to be surprised at how capable AI is (ie. being "impressed") and at the same time be also unwilling to pay the costs / repercussions and want to ban / regulate it.
In this context, being deeply unimpressed with something is equivalent to calling that something "irrelevant" / "incapable". If AI was no more impressive than it was before the LLM boom then there wouldn't have been such a reaction against it to begin with. If anything, people being now opposed to modern AI is proof of how impactful AI has become.
@Ferk Ah, I see.
I suppose so.
As a one-time committee member on Skeptics in the Pub, there are a lot of things in life that *demonstrably* Do Not Work, never did work, and can be proved not to ever be possible, which all the same, billions of people are very impressed by.
Homeopathy is my go-to example -- see:
https://www.howdoeshomeopathywork.com/
This is true of all Supplementary, Complementary and Alternative Medicine. It's all a S.C.A.M. ;-)
But it goes much further. Gods, for example. All 100% made up.
And yet...
Homeopathy is 100% a scam. LLMs are just overhyped. Big difference.