406
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2025
406 points (100.0% liked)
Vegan
1405 readers
6 users here now
A place for solarpunks working toward a world without speciesism
Rules
- This is not a place to debate veganism
- There is no place for (carnist) trolls
- No unsolicited promotion of commercial products
- No speciesism
- No promotion of violence in any way
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
When your work has influence the course of pretty much all music that came after it I can absolutely understand wanting to at least maintain a semblance of control of your actual work.
I think there are a lot of problems with copyright law but I don't have issue with an artist maintaining control over their own work while they're alive.
Corporations in the other hand....
He can still control his hands, can't he? He can still decide whether he goes on stage?
How is it his work if someone else learns to perform a song he wrote? How is it controlling his work to say someone can't copy a recording of someone else playing that song?
You realize that those rules also protect a lesser known artist getting their work stolen from a far more influential artist too right? It's generally a good thing that a super successful artist can't just copy a lesser known song and reap the benefits for it.
except those lesser knowns dont copyright shit and the influential ones do it constantly and get away with it