25
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2025
25 points (100.0% liked)
askgaming
481 readers
110 users here now
A Fediverse community for questions related to gaming.
It's dangerous to go alone! Join AskGaming.
Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
Related communities:
!TipOfMyJoystick@retrolemmy.com
!videogamesuggestions@lemmy.zip
!patientgamers@sh.itjust.works
!tycoon@lemmy.world
!crpg@lemmy.world
!ask@piefed.social
founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
Games will be integrating AI (LLM or similar) in a big way. At first, it'll suck and be intrusive and everyone will hate it.
Then—as the amount of VRAM creeps upwards in the average GPU—it'll reach a threshold where it can be good and then some game will come out that everyone loves. It'll use (local) AI in a great way and the game wouldn't be the same without it.
I predicted something similar. Basically: LLMs generating "fluff" speech of unimportant NPCs, so they don't repeat the same thing over and over. Then the underlying tech (neural networks) replacing scripts to decide opponent actions; the main appeal will be that opponents will adapt to your playstyle, as if you were "training" the model without realising it.
For example, let's say you're playing a racing game. Your first runs will be pretty much the same as now. But later runs, the AI "catches" on your strategy, and reacts to it, like:
It would be challenging for game designers, too; they'd need to find the right metrics for the AI. For example if you simply "reward"/"punish" the AI based on wins and losses, the AI will use strategies like ganging up against the player - sure, this is effective, but it is not fun at all.
BTW here's a cool video of someone "teaching" AI to play Monopoly. I believe the process will be similar-ish, except models would be already a bit pre-"trained" a bit when you buy the game, and further "training" is simply from the player playing it.
CPU/IGP RAM inference is quite viable; the software/training infrastructure just isn't there yet. And honestly this is a good case for a swarm or APIs.
And yeah, the slop will be horrible until they're used in a more integrated/modest manner.
...Or it might just be crap forever? I dunno, there are a lot of dud ideas in gaming software world.
To replace the existing AI/bots in games? I admit, I have no idea how current game AI works, but LLMs might make them way smarter than before.
That, and a whole lot of other things.
Imagine any game where you've got an assistant/sidekick... Say, a fairy companion that not only says, "Listen!" Every now and again to point out hidden things nearby, but also occasionally makes fun of you when you miss an easy shot. Or reminds you that you really shouldn't have accepted this side quest if you were going to take THREE FRIGGIN WEEKS to finish it.
The possibilities are endless!
What I would do would make a game sidekick that had a constant fear that they were in a simulation and would try to break through the 4th wall when it (the game) hears (via your PC's microphone) people talking in the background through "your voice". Or when it hears your phone ring or message tones, etc. Because that would be so immersive and also hilarious!